For what it's worth, I'd be willing to pay for an expanded ROTW with BC style comments, betting strategy, even and odds line with that program you had up a few years a go where you tediously input 3 likely figures, percentages that reflected the likelihood that each number would be run, and expected ground loss. (post time wt. maybe, too) I'd pay $5 a race for that analysis. 1-5 races a weekend would be most practical, but here'd be your chance to offer the most measurable opportunity to see how effective your product is when placed in the hands of a competent TG user. You could even post addendum once scratches and weather was known. Either way, it'd be an interesting exercise. Let's face it: Alan, Jerry, and probably a few others do this for themselves anyway. Granted, you may "ruin your price" on that particular race, but I'd really like to see empiracal evidence that sheet players ruin all the prices in big races with $500 plus bet into the pools. Maybe I'm wrong. But I stand by my contention that it's the rebates that make a successful player, not getting 3-1 on a horse instead of the 9-2 you think is fair odds and everyone that hung on your every word in the analysis are the ones that ruined the price by mercilessly pounding your overlay horse.