I will not re-hash the argument. You did NOT respond to his point in the last paragraph. What you were doing (as opposed to responding) was trying to co-opt his argument, with your arm around his shoulder, while telling everyone how much you like him.

A 'response' would have been - "bj, you don't get it" (that's what you're saying now, right? - why didn't you say this before?). I'm glad you like him, and I'm sure he is thrilled even if he doesn't understand you. Under these circumstances and given your method of discourse ("welcome back bj, you don't get it, but I missed you"), I can live with you calling me dishonest, stupid or anything else.

As for the Chuckles-AIDS thing, I don't know exactly what you are talking about, but since this must pre-date this string, if you lost all respect for me back then, I'm wondering why you didn't mention that when you mentioned my name in the first place when you were going at it with Mall. You're a good one to talk about honesty pal. And your perspective is a hoot.

Good luck with the 'points-time-distance relationship' thing. Maybe JB will give you a separate space on the website for your theories - Aly's Corner. This way we can clear the board of this rubbish once and for all. HP