Re: (1471 Views)
Posted by: Alydar in California (IP Logged)
Date: March 01, 2002 03:03AM

Hi HP. You forgot to give me some credit for calling "Drops of Jupiter" song of the year.

"Maybe TG should add a notation to op (off poorly)...the horse was off slowly and the Sprinting Length was more important according to Alydar."

Maybe you, HP, should read the words that are on top of the ROTW every week: "Each path wide is worth about one length...at TODAY'S DISTANCE that equals...of a TG point." It varies according to distance, and off poorly would too. You are making a fool out of yourself, and I am thoroughly tired of your shi#.

"If two horses were likely to run 3s..Common sense would dictate the longer the race, the more weight matters."

No. Common sense would dictate that you look at the TG introduction page. 5 pounds = one point, REGARDLESS of distance. That is the methodology (I hate that word) you said you were in line with. Giving extra credit for lighter weight at longer distances is double counting because weight/distance is in the formula already. 5 pounds = one point. Forget the distance. Just look at the weights and adjust. And if you want a TG-Rags beaten-lengths chart, let me know. I picked up a really good one several months ago. None of that "approximately" crap.

"You argue like a woman."

Thank you. I had a lot of practice. My ex-girlfriend makes Camille Paglia sound like Chrissy of "Three's Company."

"There is no such thing as a 'more important length'."

See above. And quit wrapping those skinny quotation marks around words I didn't write. I wrote: "A length is more important..."

"I do not consider [weight] differences of less than five pounds."

Yeah. That fifth pound does all the work. Fuc# the first four. I can see you've given this a lot of thought, HP.

"I know you like the guy. I do too."

No, HP. You don't like me. That has been quite obvious for some time, and the reason for it is equally obvious.



Subject Written By Posted
Not so fast, HP (2432 Views) Alydar in California 02/27/2002 07:43PM
Re: (1446 Views) HP 02/28/2002 11:47AM
Re: (1572 Views) TGJB 02/28/2002 12:43PM
Re: (1399 Views) HP 02/28/2002 01:04PM
Re: (1471 Views) Alydar in California 03/01/2002 03:03AM
Re:No soup for you Aly! (1575 Views) Mall 03/01/2002 03:47AM
Re: (1521 Views) HP 03/01/2002 08:37AM
Re: Send me the chart NOW! (1484 Views) Mall 03/01/2002 10:39AM
Re: (1491 Views) HP 03/01/2002 11:16AM
Re: Weight etc. (1504 Views) TGJB 03/01/2002 04:21PM
Re: (1484 Views) Alydar in California 03/02/2002 09:17PM
Re: (1487 Views) HP 03/03/2002 09:43AM
Re: (1406 Views) bryan teel 03/03/2002 04:18PM
Re: (1538 Views) Alydar in California 03/03/2002 05:39PM
Re: (1412 Views) Alydar in California 03/04/2002 12:00AM
Re: (1337 Views) HP 03/04/2002 09:20AM
Re: (1379 Views) Alydar in California 03/04/2002 03:48PM
Re: (1567 Views) HP 03/04/2002 05:00PM
Re: (1458 Views) nunzio 03/04/2002 05:38PM
Re: (1494 Views) Alydar in California 03/04/2002 06:28PM
Re: (1357 Views) bryan teel 03/04/2002 08:04PM
Re: (1384 Views) Alydar in California 03/05/2002 02:18AM
Re: (1487 Views) HP 03/05/2002 09:01AM
Re: (1433 Views) Alydar in California 03/05/2002 01:09PM
Re: (1447 Views) HP 03/05/2002 02:10PM
Re: (1378 Views) TGJB 03/05/2002 02:37PM
Re: (1555 Views) HP 03/05/2002 02:52PM
Re: (1541 Views) Alydar in California 03/05/2002 03:30PM
Re: (1389 Views) Alydar in California 03/05/2002 03:12PM
Re: (1444 Views) TGJB 03/05/2002 04:18PM
Re: (1415 Views) HP 03/05/2002 04:40PM
Re: (1521 Views) OPM 03/06/2002 12:25AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.