http://www.racingnsw.com.au/page.asp?parm=vet.main

I posted this link once before - but can't remember under what topic/title. This is the Vet section of the Australian Racing Site and it is what every jurisdiction's should be!

As for Hong Kong, the below link from the Racing and Consortium group here is interesting in both the manner of how the subject investigation was convened (an anonymous group of complainers go to the racing heads to complain about a trainer winning too much)and the fact that they waited until Silent Witness lost to even post the results!

http://www.rmtcnet.com/showpage.asp?story=71

Lastly - for Jerry - when I read in the Racing Form (I believe it was Hegarty because he is the one who never connects the dots) that Maryland planned to do post-race samples rather than pre-race because they had so much "experience" in doing post race testing...I could not believe what I was reading.

Because of their vast experience in determining from a post race sample whether there was anything illegal present, they became the experts. Seems to me the paucity of their results should have told you something about the relative success of their efforts!

So I assumed that the Allday horses would be "up to speed". Not so...High Limit only ran fast for a little while and then quit; Ashado made a move but it wasn't enough. What I always noted in the past was that the horses seemed to run at fast as they were able but for a prolonged period of time.

Haven't seen this in the TC races - but it appears live and well again in a certain barn in Kentucky.



Delmar Deb