Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023  • 2 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
ROTW (462 Views)
Posted by: miff (IP Logged)
Date: May 29, 2005 10:34AM

Jerry,

You can defend your horses are getting faster theory until the cows come home. Your Najran example is old and isolated.Today, we know that most race tracks are scraping the surface on major race days making it produce fast raw times.Tracks are NOT slower today especially on big race days.

You failed to address my earlier comments that horses are NOT bigger and stronger than they were years ago, go check like I did.All agree that most other species are bigger, stronger, faster than years ago.We know about nutrition etc, but your ASSUMPTION that runners are generally bigger than they used to be, is wrong.

The fact remains that you are unable to justify or explain why so many average dirt performances come up in the negative territory on your product.I am not talking about high class runners throwing big time figs.

Between the "ugly" pairs and the inordinate number of negative figs awarded for "common" performances, it is difficult to have the same confidence in the figs, as in years past.

Like I stated previously, I believe that somewhere along the line, your personal opinions/prejudices have creapt into your figure making endeavors.This may explain why some figs are now close to ridiculous on occasion,imo.

Specifically,once again,NAME the runners who would "dust"Fager and Sec with all things equal, I would love to take you to task on those two specifically.Enough generalities without any proof and only your fairly isolated opinion on Horses Getting Faster.

Lastly, there is no argument from me that it is reasonable to think that horses(runners) are a couple of fifths faster in general but NOT 2 secs(10 lenghts) as you state.Don't go near Harness racing, I owned 20 of them and there are MANY reasons why they are 5 seconds+ faster than they used to be.



miff



Subject Written By Posted
peter pan (730 Views) mikemd 05/27/2005 11:41PM
Re: peter pan (390 Views) Michael D. 05/28/2005 06:42AM
Re: peter pan (395 Views) big18741 05/28/2005 07:55AM
pace edge ? (395 Views) johndrj 05/28/2005 11:08AM
Re: pace edge ? (416 Views) twoshoes 05/28/2005 11:15AM
Re: peter pan (451 Views) davidrex 05/29/2005 12:59PM
Re: peter pan (345 Views) kev 05/29/2005 01:32PM
Re: peter pan (402 Views) miff 05/29/2005 01:39PM
Re: peter pan (400 Views) kev 05/29/2005 02:02PM
Re: peter pan (382 Views) miff 05/29/2005 02:20PM
Re: peter pan (392 Views) mikemd 05/29/2005 03:18PM
Re: peter pan (444 Views) miff 05/29/2005 03:21PM
Re: peter pan (358 Views) mikemd 05/29/2005 05:37PM
Re: peter pan (374 Views) miff 05/29/2005 05:49PM
Re: peter pan (399 Views) miff 05/29/2005 05:52PM
Re: peter pan (363 Views) marcus 05/29/2005 06:24PM
Re: peter pan (388 Views) miff 05/29/2005 06:43PM
Re: peter pan (381 Views) marcus 05/29/2005 07:42PM
Re: peter pan (448 Views) ronwar 05/28/2005 04:45PM
Re: peter pan (364 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 05/28/2005 05:25PM
Re: peter pan (413 Views) Saddlecloth 05/28/2005 05:51PM
Re: peter pan (418 Views) jimbo66 05/28/2005 09:30PM
Re: peter pan (373 Views) 05/29/2005 09:27AM
ROTW (462 Views) miff 05/29/2005 10:34AM
Re: ROTW (377 Views) kev 05/29/2005 10:58AM
Re: ROTW (381 Views) miff 05/29/2005 11:16AM
Re: ROTW (373 Views) kev 05/29/2005 12:24PM
Re: ROTW (381 Views) richiebee 05/29/2005 12:11PM
Re: ROTW (376 Views) 05/29/2005 12:34PM
Re: ROTW (358 Views) miff 05/29/2005 01:15PM
Re: ROTW (406 Views) TGJB 05/29/2005 02:18PM
Re: ROTW (417 Views) miff 05/29/2005 02:30PM
Re: ROTW (350 Views) TGJB 05/29/2005 02:42PM
Re: peter pan (403 Views) jbelfior 05/31/2005 11:26AM
Re: peter pan (382 Views) Michael D. 05/29/2005 11:01AM
Re: peter pan (436 Views) jimbo66 05/29/2005 12:40PM
Re: peter pan (338 Views) TGJB 05/29/2005 02:27PM
Re: peter pan (374 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 05/29/2005 08:02PM
Re: peter pan (358 Views) TGJB 05/29/2005 08:06PM
Re: peter pan (421 Views) 05/30/2005 11:20AM
Re: peter pan (429 Views) 05/30/2005 11:27AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.