Re: Handicapping the Undercard (689 Views)
Posted by:
Caradoc (IP Logged)
Date: June 10, 2005 02:06PM
Jerry, I see what you mean if you look at the runs-based stats for McLaughlin, but I would have thought you would have focused on his figure-based stats. If so, they look pretty good (19% new tops, 32% pairs), and are comparable to his overall figure-based stats (16% new tops, 34% pairs). Isn't this a case where the runs-based stats are misleading?