Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Modesty Stakes Churchill May 3, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: ROTW (549 Views)
Posted by: jimbo66 (IP Logged)
Date: June 18, 2005 11:44AM

Don't see it Shanahan. The horse has run his best races fresh. I hate chalk, but I can't see this horse losing. Badge of Silver is definitely slower than his reputation, his good race being in the negative 1 range. Perfect Drift hasn't run a race that would win this since the 2003 version of this exact race. What odds are acceptable on a horse that hasn't run well enough to win in 2 years? 4-1 is not even close enough.

Not a good betting race at all and very surprising to see it as the ROTW as there are a lot of interesting races this week. Look at the conclusion that JB or Allan came to, the top 4 weights are the best with Saint Liam looking the best. Saint Liam 6-5, unbettable. Badge of Silver maybe 9-5, an underlay. Perfect Drift 4-1, unbettable. Presidential Affair, maybe 5-1, and unlikely. Single SL in the NTRA pick 4 and look for value elsewhere.

Spa, don't mean to be sarcastic, but your post is an example of what has changed with this board in the past 6 months (for the worse). What logic or what in the world would lead you to conclude that Saint Liam over the 2nd, 3rd and 4th choices, would be an overlay in the Superfecta? Or are you just posting for the sake of posting?




Subject Written By Posted
ROTW (1090 Views) spa 06/17/2005 03:38PM
Re: ROTW (675 Views) davidrex 06/17/2005 04:05PM
Re: ROTW (814 Views) HP 06/17/2005 04:28PM
Re: ROTW (588 Views) 06/17/2005 04:58PM
Re: ROTW (609 Views) spa 06/17/2005 04:34PM
Re: ROTW (592 Views) HP 06/17/2005 04:44PM
Re: ROTW (648 Views) mikemd 06/17/2005 05:50PM
Re: ROTW (563 Views) shanahan 06/18/2005 10:59AM
Re: ROTW (606 Views) spa 06/18/2005 11:12AM
Re: ROTW (545 Views) shanahan 06/18/2005 11:37AM
Re: ROTW (549 Views) jimbo66 06/18/2005 11:44AM
Re: ROTW (664 Views) davidrex 06/18/2005 12:10PM
Re: ROTW (505 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 06/18/2005 03:51PM
Re: ROTW (537 Views) 06/18/2005 05:45PM
Re: ROTW (482 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 06/18/2005 06:01PM
Re: ROTW (505 Views) 06/18/2005 06:05PM
Re: ROTW (482 Views) 06/18/2005 06:11PM
Re: ROTW (495 Views) Michael D. 06/18/2005 06:19PM
Re: ROTW (484 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 06/18/2005 06:23PM
Re: ROTW (521 Views) 06/18/2005 06:28PM
Re: ROTW (526 Views) Michael D. 06/18/2005 06:29PM
Interesting Foster Figure. (590 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 06/18/2005 06:35PM
Re: Interesting Foster Figure. (649 Views) Michael D. 06/18/2005 06:45PM
Re: Interesting Foster Figure. (735 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 06/18/2005 06:52PM
Re: ROTW (550 Views) 06/18/2005 06:36PM
Re: ROTW (600 Views) shanahan 06/18/2005 10:25PM
Re: ROTW (566 Views) Michael D. 06/18/2005 06:04PM
Re: ROTW (575 Views) J-DUB 06/18/2005 11:39AM
Re: ROTW (561 Views) kev 06/18/2005 11:54AM
Re: ROTW (534 Views) J-DUB 06/18/2005 03:10PM
Re: ROTW (527 Views) mikemd 06/18/2005 03:26PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.