Hey Jerry. No response? Disappointed? What were you expecting - some secret identity (e.g., a [color=red][B][U]commie spy[/B][/U][/color])?

Methinks you are paranoid, mainly brought about by your past actions against former colleagues. Live by the sword and die by the sword? Not necessarily. Why not just drop the politics and stick with your original premise of continually improving the numbers?

Other than the previous flaws I have pointed out, you still make some claims that are just plain false. And I don't use that word lightly, as I know very well the difference between making an arguable (though questionable) assumption versus making a claim that of itself can be proved false through the laws of physics, statistics, and/or general mathematics and science.

Want more? So do I. Quid pro quo, Jerry. Quid pro quo. E-mail me if you want more specifics, as your online responses are catered to the masses as political (i.e., meaningless) drivel.

And while I have your attention, what ever happened to your investigation of how beaten lengths correlates to a time increment?