Conspiracy Idiots? (661 Views)
Posted by:
Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: May 07, 2007 06:38AM
Lets lay down some conspiracy framework.
I know Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. I'm certain of it, but then I took the time to read the Warren Commission Report.
Its clear that New York City was not attacked by our own government on 9-11. Its equally clear that government was negligent in allowing it to happen and criminal in misrepresenting it to America.
I can't think of any other consipiracies, because my mind doesn't work that way.
On the other hand, Todd Pletcher is using drugs to cheat and if it wasn't for Steve Allday and his "titrations" (Which I believe are a combination to increase red blood cells and reduce latic acid) Todd Pletcher would be just another trainer that might have to wait two or five years to get back in the Derby instead of proclaiming, (As he did Saturday), "I'll be back with a dozen next year". He may be back, but I believe more thorough and more accurate blood tests await him.
The real shame is that outfits like Team Valor that should know better stoop to embrace him and owners that only know their millions don't have a clue he is cheating.
Lance Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Miff: A while back, I asked, "Is there a reason
> Pletcher and Frankel are 0-fer in the Derby and a
> combined 6 for 90 in the Breeders Cup, despite
> saddling an inordinate number of short-priced
> steeds? Are there more barn-security/surveillance
> measures in place for the Derby than there are for
> your average Saturday race card?"
>
> You stated that "the answer is no." Do you still
> believe this? Do you still believe that my
> observations about Pletcher horses rebreaking is
> just "in mind"?
>
> The reason I'm revisiting this is because of
> something Jerry posted today: "buried somewhere in
> the coverage of the Derby was a story about 24/7
> surveillance of the horses. That could have been a
> factor."
>
> I'm curious if his words, coupled with the dismal
> performances (again) of the Pletcher horses, have
> you wondering if the so-called "conspiracy idiots"
> might be onto something.