Re: Never Dispense with Mathematics (523 Views)
Posted by:
Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: June 22, 2007 06:20AM
Par and Pace aren't held in the highest regard here, but I tend to support the notion that the fractional times can have a bearing upon the final time and the final figure. (See the Belmont Stakes.)
streetbull Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Chuckles_the_Clown2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> --
> >
> > Thats exactly what par is, the "average" for a
> > specific class at a specific distance. The more
> > specific you make the class the more accurate
> the
> > average.
> >
> > Par is step one.
> >
> > Step two is determining race by race deviations
> > from Par for a Day's Card and calculating a
> > variant or "daily average off par"
> >
> > Step three is determining how individual races
> > fall in regard to that daily average.
> >
> > Step Four is considering all the things that
> > Tgraph considers and
> >
> > Step Five is assigning a figure.
> >
> > The surprise is....
> >
> > No one does all five steps. Well, almost no
> one.
> >
> > CtC
>
>
> Any accurate number formula would have to had
> integrated a significant theory from Huey Mahl's
> book, "The Race is Pace".....
>
> In his small book, he hints at a very important
> theory and clue for an accurate energy formula
> which I think best evaluates form cycle better
> than any formula out in print.....The clue????
>
>
> "The early pace creates a telescopic effect on the
> overall race..."
>
> The words "telescopic effect" signifies a huge
> breakthrough if one can understand its
> implications.........
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.