Re: To JB - Number Stephen Foster (487 Views)
Posted by:
milfordflash (IP Logged)
Date: June 22, 2007 09:12AM
Thank you for the response to my origianl question. I think my mistakes were in the correlation of Beyer points to TG points at the distance, and secondly the ground loss issue. I assumed ( a very dangerous word) that the Beyer number did not take ground loss into account. I beleive I read where Beyer himself said that his numbers were raw times only. Now, if the ground loss is being built into the varient, then we have a whole new issue...and that isn't even accounting for weight differences.