Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Which We Know Why? (904 Views)
Posted by: David Patent (IP Logged)
Date: October 07, 2002 06:33PM

Mall,

I didn't have any time Sunday to go to the RBR. It was 'birthday party Sunday' yesterday and we traipsed around town attending various parties for newly minted 2 and 3 y.o. -- none of them Derby contenders. If JB can repost the SA, KEE, and BEL cards from Saturday I would be most grateful.

As to the intimation of 'I know more than you do,' I agree with Alydar. You're a bit smug in your last post.

Here is what I do know about my ROI and the 'bounce' theory as I apply it when handicapping:

First, I don't play a horse to bounce just because he/she ran a top. I look for instances where 1) there is a horse with a shaky pattern who just ran a top, 2) an older, heavily exposed horse who just ran a top, or 3) a horse who, regardless of prior pattern, just ran a ridiculous number on an absolute scale.

My four biggest non-p6 scores have come when I have focused an a favorite that I believe will be off the board or out of the top two due to a severe bounce, including this year's Belmont, Belmont 1999 and a couple forgettable allowance races. My ROI in these races is very positive.

Of course sometimes I am wrong, but here is why playing the bounce theory makes sense. The crowd almost always significantly overbets a horse coming off a big effort in last. There seems to be an ingrained assumption in many bettors that a horse will generally repeat his last effort (assuming it was not excused by some misfortune or an off-track). So big numbers often create big overlays and underlays.

To take this last weekend as a case in point, however, projecting a bounce does not always lead to a big bet. The only races where I projected a big bounce by the favorite where I even bet the race were the Ancient Title -- which I hit big, The Champagne, which I hit little, and the Lane's End Futurity, which I whiffed. In the other races, I just didn't see enough value to justify a bet.

Do I know what % of the time I am right when I really stick my neck out against a horse? No. I wish I tracked my results that granularly. But I do have a general sense of the kinds of scenarios that play out well for me and those that don't. My challenge is to avoide more races containing the latter and focus more on the former. Projecting big bounces, esp. in big races, is definitely one of the former for me.



Subject Written By Posted
Weekend Stakes -- Ragozin View (1773 Views) David Patent 10/04/2002 05:48PM
Re: Weekend Stakes -- Ragozin View (945 Views) Michael D. 10/05/2002 02:39AM
Re: Weekend Stakes -- Ragozin View (960 Views) OPM 10/05/2002 03:58AM
Re: Weekend Stakes -- Ragozin View (1005 Views) Jurmala Berzins 10/05/2002 06:05AM
Which We Know Why? (984 Views) Mall 10/05/2002 02:31PM
Re: Which We Know Why? (917 Views) derby1592 10/05/2002 03:10PM
Re: Which We Know Why? (964 Views) David G. Patent 10/06/2002 04:24AM
Re: Which We Know Why? (953 Views) Mall 10/06/2002 02:10PM
Mall, Big Units, Teasing, Tables (952 Views) Alydar in California 10/07/2002 08:42AM
You Can't Always Get What You Want (1001 Views) Mall 10/08/2002 04:59PM
But if you try sometimes (966 Views) Alydar in California 10/08/2002 08:52PM
You just might find (990 Views) Alydar in California 10/09/2002 04:32AM
You get what you need... (1041 Views) nunzio 10/09/2002 09:59AM
Re: You get what you need... (1027 Views) Alydar in California 10/10/2002 08:01AM
Re: You get what you need... (1025 Views) nunzio 10/11/2002 08:11AM
Re: You get what you need... (962 Views) David G. Patent 10/12/2002 12:39PM
Re: You get what you need... (911 Views) Alydar in California 10/14/2002 12:33AM
Re: You just might find (988 Views) Mall 10/09/2002 12:03PM
Re: You just might find (930 Views) David Patent 10/09/2002 03:00PM
Re: You just might find (909 Views) Mall 10/09/2002 11:06PM
Re: Which We Know Why? (904 Views) David Patent 10/07/2002 06:33PM
Re: Which We Know Why? (929 Views) TGJB 10/07/2002 07:06PM
Re: Which We Know Why? (952 Views) David Patent 10/08/2002 04:36PM
Re: Which We Know Why? (975 Views) HP 10/08/2002 05:24PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.