Jerry,

Please read my post carefully. I did not use the term 'fastest' in a general sense. I spoke of 'fastest' prior number and whether a horse was overall 'faster'.

On Ragozin, TMW had paired up 5- in his last two races. Scrimshaw's best route number was a 6". Dynever had a 4- but had bounced to an 8 in the LS Derby with trouble.

Supervisor had an 8 top.

So, TMW was the 4th fastest in terms of top but was -- in my view -- a better play than Dynever to run better in the Belmont, given Dynever's lack of foundation, the large move to the 4- two back, and the size of his reaction in the LS Derby.

Again, I didn't cash on the Belmont but I don't think that anybody was hiding anything in their analysis of TMW.