Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Addendum (637 Views)
Posted by: HP (IP Logged)
Date: June 11, 2003 11:51AM

Marc,

If you think Mandown's posts regarding David Patent are motivated or influenced by the fact that he works or has worked for TG you are welcome to your opinion. If you think my past employment is a relevant factor in my posts, I don't think I could convince you otherwise.

I would imagine Mandown read David's posts and had a reaction and decided to post it. Knowing what a total wiseass he is, the idea that Mandown's posts were tainted or in ANY WAY influenced by his present/former employment is laughable, and I felt compelled to post as much, but I would hereby retract anything that you could call "vouching." Mandown posted what he did because he is/was an employee and a suckup. Also a foreigner. Have it your way.

To get back to the (I think) original subject, I don't think David Patent's posts are always partisan. What I object to is that David's posts change according to his venue. Over here he posts and has some reasonable dialogue. Then, sometimes on the SAME DAY, he will post on the SHEETS board and adopt a wholly different tone and attitude. As he knows that Jerry can't respond over there, that seems like dirty pool, and doubly so since there is nothing stopping him from continuing his dialogue over here. I think "partisan" would be a charitable way to describe David's conduct.

You wrote that you

"think it's worth reminding the few that are following along what we've got going on here-- current part-time employees and recent employees vouching for each other, attacking the competition, etc. It's meaningless stuff. No less meaningless if/when Ragozin employees do it, either."

Congratulations on reminding them. Now that that's over with, I think there is SOME distinction between the kind of behavior David exhibits (as I've spelled out above) and some of the other "vouching" and whatnot that you refer to.

But you know what? Who cares! I can't figure out what's happening in my own house half the time, so I don't expect to get to the bottom of what makes David tick anytime soon. Life is full of injustice, and Jerry will fight his own battles. If this kind of thing makes David happy more power to him.

Obviously we have a different point of view on this. I can live and let live and I have an important meeting with the idiots I work for now.

Regards, HP



Subject Written By Posted
Re: Repost-- first 3 of 124 questions (1235 Views) TGJB 06/09/2003 06:01PM
Re: Repost-- first 3 of 124 questions (665 Views) HP 06/10/2003 08:48AM
Re: Repost-- first 3 of 124 questions (720 Views) Marc At 06/10/2003 10:50AM
Addendum (798 Views) Marc At 06/10/2003 11:00AM
Re: Addendum (706 Views) TGJB 06/10/2003 12:19PM
Re: Addendum (686 Views) TGJB 06/10/2003 06:03PM
Re: Addendum (710 Views) Marc At 06/11/2003 10:44AM
Re: Addendum (637 Views) HP 06/11/2003 11:51AM
Re: Addendum (589 Views) mandown 06/11/2003 02:39PM
Re: Addendum (547 Views) TGJB 06/11/2003 02:55PM
Re: Addendum (635 Views) dpatent 06/11/2003 05:22PM
Re: Addendum (661 Views) TGJB 06/11/2003 06:09PM
Re: Addendum (745 Views) dpatent 06/11/2003 06:33PM
Re: Addendum (724 Views) TGJB 06/11/2003 06:51PM
Re: Addendum (676 Views) mandown 06/11/2003 06:46PM
Re: Addendum (658 Views) dpatent 06/11/2003 08:13PM
Re: Addendum (632 Views) mandown 06/12/2003 03:37AM
Re: Addendum (636 Views) HP 06/12/2003 08:56AM
Why Don't Sharks Eat Overboard Lawyers? (653 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 06/12/2003 11:11AM
Re: Addendum (743 Views) TGJB 06/12/2003 02:14PM
Re: Addendum (623 Views) dpatent 06/12/2003 02:46PM
Re: Addendum (676 Views) TGJB 06/12/2003 02:53PM
Re: Addendum: DPatent (775 Views) bdhsheets 06/12/2003 06:21PM
Re: Addendum (634 Views) dpatent 06/12/2003 02:37PM
Re: Addendum (644 Views) mandown 06/12/2003 03:09PM
Re: Addendum (610 Views) tonyk 06/12/2003 03:44PM
Re: Repost-- first 3 of 124 questions (631 Views) HP 06/10/2003 11:47AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.