In the early days of this board the Ragozin office posted here under aliases, and I did point it out-- they were attacking the results of our picks while defending, on their board, not taking any positions that could be judged. We figured it out because Paul knew who their ISP was, and pointed it out because it was hypocritical.

If Jake posted here under an assumed name, the question would be, as I have made abundantly clear, what was the nature of his post? If he is attacking an argument on the merits, no, it would not matter. As an aside, with few exceptions, when I post on the Rag board I make it clear it is me, by using the first or second person. The exceptions are when I pose questions, as opposed to making a case (as far as I can remember).

Funny thing about this issue-- the only ones who seem to think it's important are the ones who have attacked me and TG previously.
Which brings us to-- David, I know it's not nearly as significant as Mandown not revealing his affiliation, but what did you think of the Touch Of The Blues ground stuff (lies), the letter from my lawyer concerning Ragozin employees lying about us, Alydar's admission that he has knowledge of Ragozin employees bad acts, etc.? Obviously, since (contrary to Mandown's contention) you are unbiased, you must have really gotten upset by all that stuff. Did you post somewhere admonishing Friedman about it? If you did, I missed it.



TGJB