Order Online |
Complete Menu of
TG Data products |
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data |
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse |
Free Products |
Download and Review previous days' data. |
With detailed comments |
Email notification when your horse races |
Information |
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials |
Consulting services and Graph Racing |
Where to buy TG around the country |
Historical
races and handicapping articles |
Handicapping |
Major handicapping contest winners |
|
|
Re: Fast pace, new top (662 Views)
Posted by: JimP (IP Logged)
Date: September 25, 2003 12:04PM
It's still not clear. Let's say a given horse (named Horse) is a closer in a 6 furlong race. Let's say that Horse is in a race with a fast pace. The pace setter (named Pace) runs the half in :45. Horse sits 10 lengths off this fast pace. So Horse gets the half in :47. (I'm rounding to keep the example simple). And Horse closes to win in a final time of 1:11. According to my calculation Horse ran the final quarter in :24 to do that. In the next race, the pace is a slow :46 for the half and Horse is sitting 5 lengths off that pace so that Horse runs the half in :47. Why should I expect Horse to be able to run a final quarter any faster or slower in this race than the :24 he ran in the first race? According to my calculation Horse should have used the same amount of energy to the half in both (i.e., he ran a :47, laying well off the pace in both).
Fast pace, new top (1086 Views)
|
OPM |
09/25/2003 01:28AM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (737 Views)
|
|
09/25/2003 09:03AM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (662 Views) |
JimP |
09/25/2003 12:04PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (749 Views)
|
|
09/25/2003 02:32PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (858 Views)
|
jbelfior |
09/25/2003 03:13PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (700 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/25/2003 03:28PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (714 Views)
|
jbelfior |
09/25/2003 04:06PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (704 Views)
|
|
09/25/2003 07:51PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (697 Views)
|
RICH |
09/26/2003 10:13AM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (723 Views)
|
Mall |
09/26/2003 11:13AM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (719 Views)
|
jbelfior |
09/26/2003 11:56AM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (814 Views)
|
Mall |
09/26/2003 02:25PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (766 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/26/2003 02:33PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (670 Views)
|
Silver Charm |
09/26/2003 03:21PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (664 Views)
|
jbelfior |
09/26/2003 04:47PM |
Congaree (647 Views)
|
derby1592 |
09/26/2003 05:07PM |
Re: Congaree (688 Views)
|
Silver Charm |
09/26/2003 05:20PM |
Re: Congaree (726 Views)
|
JR |
09/26/2003 07:04PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (735 Views)
|
P-Dub |
09/28/2003 01:53AM |
Gutless? (764 Views)
|
Mall |
09/28/2003 08:59PM |
Re: Gutless? (760 Views)
|
OPM |
09/28/2003 09:20PM |
Re: Gutless? (814 Views)
|
Mall |
09/28/2003 10:43PM |
Re: Gutless? (752 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/29/2003 12:27PM |
Re: Gutless? (711 Views)
|
Mall |
09/29/2003 08:11PM |
Re: Gutless? (680 Views)
|
Frost King |
09/29/2003 10:59PM |
Hey Frost King (703 Views)
|
Upper Nile |
09/30/2003 07:53AM |
Re: Hey Frost King (1068 Views)
|
Frost King |
09/30/2003 11:33PM |
Re: Gutless? (821 Views)
|
alm |
10/03/2003 11:31AM |
Re: Gutless? (780 Views)
|
beyerguy |
10/08/2003 05:56PM |
Re: Gutless? (657 Views)
|
|
10/08/2003 07:44PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (669 Views)
|
OPM |
09/27/2003 09:58PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (659 Views)
|
alm |
09/27/2003 01:03PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (637 Views)
|
|
09/27/2003 04:32PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (786 Views)
|
alm |
09/27/2003 08:46PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (897 Views)
|
|
09/25/2003 07:33PM |
hey JimP (708 Views)
|
Michael D. |
09/27/2003 09:58PM |
example: Heat Haze (774 Views)
|
Michael D. |
09/27/2003 10:43PM |
Re: hey JimP (699 Views)
|
JimP |
09/28/2003 09:54AM |
Re: hey JimP (725 Views)
|
Michael D. |
09/28/2003 12:01PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (754 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/25/2003 12:42PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (759 Views)
|
|
09/25/2003 02:59PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (617 Views)
|
Michael D. |
09/27/2003 09:09PM |
ahh, 1991 (744 Views)
|
BB |
09/28/2003 01:43AM |
Re: ahh, 1991 (746 Views)
|
Michael D. |
09/28/2003 12:08PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|