Order Online |
Complete Menu of
TG Data products |
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data |
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse |
Free Products |
Download and Review previous days' data. |
With detailed comments |
Email notification when your horse races |
Information |
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials |
Consulting services and Graph Racing |
Where to buy TG around the country |
Historical
races and handicapping articles |
Handicapping |
Major handicapping contest winners |
|
|
Re: Gutless? (656 Views)
Date: October 08, 2003 07:44PM
>No way Mineshaft should be HOY if Perfect Drift wins the Classic. He beat him head to head, and would have a classic win to go with his other victories as well.<
That will be an interesting vote. He will have a win over Mineshaft, Conagree (twice) and MOD. But you just know that some people are going to argue that the win over Mineshaft was aided by a break in the weights and what some thought was a premature move by Mineshaft. Then he had another break in the weights against Congaree in the other victory.
My guess is that a lot of people are going to insist that Mineshaft was the better horse. It should be an interesting discussion.
Personally, I think Mineshaft might have been slightly the better horse, but if Perfect Drift wins the Classic over MOD and Congaree etc... at level weights I don't see how he can be denied given that the rest of his dirt record is so good (now matter what the weights).
Fast pace, new top (1086 Views)
|
OPM |
09/25/2003 01:28AM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (736 Views)
|
|
09/25/2003 09:03AM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (662 Views)
|
JimP |
09/25/2003 12:04PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (749 Views)
|
|
09/25/2003 02:32PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (858 Views)
|
jbelfior |
09/25/2003 03:13PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (700 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/25/2003 03:28PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (713 Views)
|
jbelfior |
09/25/2003 04:06PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (704 Views)
|
|
09/25/2003 07:51PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (697 Views)
|
RICH |
09/26/2003 10:13AM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (722 Views)
|
Mall |
09/26/2003 11:13AM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (718 Views)
|
jbelfior |
09/26/2003 11:56AM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (814 Views)
|
Mall |
09/26/2003 02:25PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (766 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/26/2003 02:33PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (670 Views)
|
Silver Charm |
09/26/2003 03:21PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (664 Views)
|
jbelfior |
09/26/2003 04:47PM |
Congaree (647 Views)
|
derby1592 |
09/26/2003 05:07PM |
Re: Congaree (688 Views)
|
Silver Charm |
09/26/2003 05:20PM |
Re: Congaree (726 Views)
|
JR |
09/26/2003 07:04PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (735 Views)
|
P-Dub |
09/28/2003 01:53AM |
Gutless? (764 Views)
|
Mall |
09/28/2003 08:59PM |
Re: Gutless? (760 Views)
|
OPM |
09/28/2003 09:20PM |
Re: Gutless? (814 Views)
|
Mall |
09/28/2003 10:43PM |
Re: Gutless? (752 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/29/2003 12:27PM |
Re: Gutless? (711 Views)
|
Mall |
09/29/2003 08:11PM |
Re: Gutless? (680 Views)
|
Frost King |
09/29/2003 10:59PM |
Hey Frost King (703 Views)
|
Upper Nile |
09/30/2003 07:53AM |
Re: Hey Frost King (1068 Views)
|
Frost King |
09/30/2003 11:33PM |
Re: Gutless? (821 Views)
|
alm |
10/03/2003 11:31AM |
Re: Gutless? (780 Views)
|
beyerguy |
10/08/2003 05:56PM |
Re: Gutless? (656 Views) |
|
10/08/2003 07:44PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (669 Views)
|
OPM |
09/27/2003 09:58PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (658 Views)
|
alm |
09/27/2003 01:03PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (637 Views)
|
|
09/27/2003 04:32PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (786 Views)
|
alm |
09/27/2003 08:46PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (897 Views)
|
|
09/25/2003 07:33PM |
hey JimP (708 Views)
|
Michael D. |
09/27/2003 09:58PM |
example: Heat Haze (774 Views)
|
Michael D. |
09/27/2003 10:43PM |
Re: hey JimP (698 Views)
|
JimP |
09/28/2003 09:54AM |
Re: hey JimP (724 Views)
|
Michael D. |
09/28/2003 12:01PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (754 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/25/2003 12:42PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (759 Views)
|
|
09/25/2003 02:59PM |
Re: Fast pace, new top (617 Views)
|
Michael D. |
09/27/2003 09:09PM |
ahh, 1991 (744 Views)
|
BB |
09/28/2003 01:43AM |
Re: ahh, 1991 (746 Views)
|
Michael D. |
09/28/2003 12:08PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|