Interesting stuff on the other board about the Wood, and I think he's implying that YOU, Jerry Brown, make figures based on what you think the horses ran (based on how they ran before), as opposed to actually giving the horses the figures they deserve.

They have arrived at numbers (for the Wood) that are pretty close to YOURS, Jerry Brown. Does this mean they got it right? Did they get the previous races wrong? Given the relative scales (TG is usually a little faster), what gives? If their numbers are faster than yours for the Wood (relatively speaking) I don't know what to think.

He gives some examples to confirm their approach from the Easy Goer year (which you cited in your drf article that you were kind enough to post yesterday), and he makes it sound like a ringing confirmation of their methods. Did you mess up? Can I use these figures for the Derby or what? HP