Re: Arlington Million Revisited (480 Views)
Posted by:
marcus (IP Logged)
Date: August 22, 2004 11:56AM
Lucy - Al's a buddy + I don't work for Jerry though I would in a NY second if an opertunity or spot became available that would benifit everyone ( incl even you ) becouse TG is a great company . Besides , in an attempt to keep it real , who wouldn't want go to work for TG anyway ? TG will explain if requiered I suppose . However , aside from that , TG is a part of my NY family and Jerry (along a couple other folks who also gave me alot of their time + energy )taught me what they could about racing and the biz . I know that anyone at TG be trusted and have demonstraited that to me time and again .
Comments + Analysis about upcoming races can be and are very often estute regardless of win or loss , anyway it's the roi that matters , not win % , make sense ?
Realize that one will more often be wrong about a race in so far as having the right horse win more often than their being right about a race . The whole thing is to not look too bad in doing so .
Whats your story Lucy if you don't mind me asking , is thier a thing w/ you and GW & TG , whats your line ? It's none of my affair but you sound as though you work for the competition or Ralph Nader according to many of your post's .
I had a feeling when writing my post to Al @ TG that I'd inevitably wind up hearing from you .
I respect everyones opinion at TG and value Al's take on any number racing and non racing issues ,and again I know Al + TG can be trusted , thats why I responded to his comments .
I'm not saying your opinion doesn't count for whatever reason and I don't really care how my opinions ( meeger as they are ) are recieved by anyone( w/ TG as a poss exception) .
If someone is right or wrong - they are right or wrong . The slippery slope of "why" could perhaps be the subject of future post's I don't presently have the time for .
Many a time an issue is subjective - meaning the answer isn't a black or white one , nothing in Racing (or life ) is carved in stone ( a wonderful philosiphy )and is open to interpetation . Is that not right ?
I will edit a post usually to embelish or augment and not to attenuate - due to ( inadequecies and deficiantcies and short comings ) my inexperience as a writer . Incidently , I do know that everyone is entightled to thier opinions even when wrong as in your case ...
You had the first and now can have the last word on this one if desired - it's the least type of courtesy that I can extend + I'm not going over the wall on this and besides , I tend to value opinions ( or hold too values ) which help to put bread on the table , how about you ? ok ...
Post Edited (08-22-04 13:31)
marcus