Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Modesty Stakes Churchill May 3, 2024  • 2 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Lots Of Stuff (414 Views)
Posted by: (IP Logged)
Date: August 25, 2004 12:02PM

I agree that pace and bias are hugely important.

I just believe it is an error to try to incorporate them into a figure. I think it would be even worse if JB sold a product like that. IMO, he is doing the right thing. The only thing I would ask for is a seperate number without ground loss so I don't have to back it out and perhaps a few more pace comments.

I have also dabbled with adjusting speed figures with pace/final time formulas. I've also tried to quantify bias in terms of lengths of impact etc.. I've pretty much stopped.

Making pace figures that are as accurate as JB's speed figures is close to impossible. If you think you can, you probably don't understand all the problems. Second, IMO there is no formula that works for all horses. IMO, the impact of pace is dependent on things like stamina, brilliance and other individual qualities. So when you combine a "reasonably accurate" speed figure with a "somewhat inaccurate" pace figure and put them into a "somewhat inaccurate" formula you often get a mess. Same with bias.

IMO, what you want to do is look at the horse's figures and know the trips.

Using Beyers in an extreme example:

If a horse ran 100, 97, 101, 98, and 77 in his last 5 races and the 77 was in a very fast paced duel on a deal rail, you really don't have much of problem here. You can view him as a high 90s/100 horse. If you plug slightly innacurate pace and bias figures into a slightly inaccurate formula and all the errors are in the same direction, you might wind up with 90 or 110. IMO, that's worse.

I rate paces as neutral, fast, very fast, slow, or very slow (paying attention to specific 1/4s and using observation as well at fractions). Rate the bias as none, strong, very strong etc... and then get a "feel" for how a horse ran based on all evidence available.

Granted, not all horses have such clear and consistent figures. However, IMO, adding complexity to an evaluation with "suspect" formulas etc... is not a good solution. It may be better than ignoring the factor, but it is not a solution.



Post Edited (08-25-04 12:07)



Subject Written By Posted
Lots Of Stuff (798 Views) TGJB 08/24/2004 02:49PM
Re: Lots Of Stuff (571 Views) JimP 08/24/2004 03:46PM
Re: Lots Of Stuff (506 Views) miff 08/24/2004 06:36PM
Re: Lots Of Stuff (450 Views) TGJB 08/24/2004 06:56PM
Re: Lots Of Stuff (497 Views) Boscar Obarra 08/24/2004 11:24PM
Re: Lots Of Stuff (441 Views) 08/25/2004 10:46AM
Re: Lots Of Stuff (481 Views) miff 08/25/2004 10:54AM
Re: Lots Of Stuff (435 Views) JJP 08/25/2004 11:09AM
Re: Lots Of Stuff (414 Views) 08/25/2004 12:02PM
Re: Lots Of Stuff (495 Views) miff 08/25/2004 12:12PM
Re: Arlington Million (483 Views) TGJB 08/24/2004 07:07PM
Re: Arlington Million (490 Views) JimP 08/25/2004 01:19PM
Re: Lots Of Stuff (449 Views) Lucy 08/25/2004 02:43AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.