Re: Hey, GOODLOOKIN' (362 Views)
Posted by: toppled (IP Logged)
Date: October 19, 2024 07:00PM
I didn't bet the race, so I'm looking at it from an impartial view. My answer is he was one of four horses in the race who got a clocker comment on the Keeneland "In Today" clocker report on Keeneland's website.
Last Saturday's 9th at Keeneland was won by a 24/1 shot who got a clocker comment on In Today. The difference is last Saturday's 9th race winner had a back top that made him competitive. That wasn't the case today, but the horse only had two races, was 1/1 at 7f & had a series of good workouts at Keeneland.
So, in conclusion, if a horse is working well at Keeneland, enough to get a comment in the In Today report, you might want to give it a 2nd look no matter how outmatched his sheet #s are.
Last Saturday's 9th at Keeneland was won by a 24/1 shot who got a clocker comment on In Today. The difference is last Saturday's 9th race winner had a back top that made him competitive. That wasn't the case today, but the horse only had two races, was 1/1 at 7f & had a series of good workouts at Keeneland.
So, in conclusion, if a horse is working well at Keeneland, enough to get a comment in the In Today report, you might want to give it a 2nd look no matter how outmatched his sheet #s are.
Subject | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|
![]() |
prist | 10/19/2024 12:24PM |
![]() ![]() |
jbelfior | 10/19/2024 05:48PM |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
toppled | 10/19/2024 07:00PM |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tavasco | 10/21/2024 04:10AM |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
prist | 10/21/2024 02:31PM |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tavasco | 10/21/2024 06:31PM |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
prist | 10/21/2024 06:53PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.