Re: Analysis of the Analysis (507 Views)
Posted by:
jimbo66 (IP Logged)
Date: October 31, 2004 07:24PM
Somewhere in the middle of the last two posts.
Silver Charm, the analysis was bad. There is no way around that. It was a tough card, but the fact is that when I look in the redboard room, every single bet suggested by the analysis was a loser. By any definition, it was bad.
But it was worth the paper it was printed on!!
The seminar, which is a different product than the analysis, was interesting, but also no help to handicap with (in hindsight). Yes, Singletary was "usable" based on T-Graph figures (and Beyer too for that matter), but he was mentioned as having being hurt by the post and Jerry was "happy" to see the change to Valdivia. Well, Flores got back on, and he got a good trip.
It was definitely a bad day for Thorograph users. But like I said in my post yesterday, it was probably a bad day for a lot of bettors. Five favorites, 2 illogical longshots and one plausible longshot doesn't often equal a good day.