Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: B.C. Numbers (519 Views)
Posted by: Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: November 03, 2004 08:26PM

TGJB wrote:

3-- We gave out our first dead rail on turf ever. It wasn't simple-- I only gave it to those who spent a significant amount of time there (basically on 2 turns, whether in a 2 or 3 turn race), but as you will see it's pretty clear. Interestingly enough, I have been told the jockeys said the inside path was bad as well.

Within context of the bulleted point, I'm assuming you mean the jocks said the inside turf path was bad. I thought inside dirt was good unless you were up against the rail. More evidence in my opinion that Kitten's Joy was denied a placing by Better Talk Now.

Was just reviewing your numbers for the Cup. Nothing raised my eyes until I got to the Juvenile. I know it was after the Juvenile fillies and it was slower than the filly race. I'm not of the opinion the track was slowing down in consideration of the Classic and I think you probably feel the same way. Nevertheless, I was surprised by Afleet Alex's number. My feeling is he overcame a tough break and an off poorly designation might account for equaling the previous number in what I felt was a much better race effort wise. He was much further behind at the first call than he has been in the past and the horses he paced against he'd seen before. It may be as simple as you calling the start more cleanly than I interpreted it.

Then your Classic gave me pause. I'm sure you realize you gave Pleasantly Perfect a near top on a likely injury and RIM a huge top. And Funny Cide the worse race of the year. (Personally I think it was even worse than scored.) Birdstone retired lame and his effort looks in line with an injury bothering him. The other efforts look good to me. If they are I realize that means the money earners ran fast. I'll defer to your ground loss calculations.

I've learned the hard way that doubting your figures is not a good way to profit. I need to study Lonestar and BC Day some more. I've got some very odd feelings about that day. Did your guys clock the races and are you comfortable with the offical clock and run ups in the juveniles? I'm very skeptical of standards in Texas racing.



Post Edited (11-03-04 20:28)



Subject Written By Posted
B.C. Numbers (888 Views) TGJB 11/03/2004 07:34PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (519 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/03/2004 08:26PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (439 Views) marcus 11/04/2004 04:12AM
Re: B.C. Numbers (524 Views) TGJB 11/04/2004 02:34PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (546 Views) Michael D. 11/05/2004 04:43AM
Re: B.C. Numbers (532 Views) jimbo66 11/05/2004 09:20AM
Re: B.C. Numbers (504 Views) miff 11/05/2004 11:18AM
Re: B.C. Numbers (526 Views) 11/05/2004 12:16PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (466 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/05/2004 01:14PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (528 Views) 11/06/2004 04:16PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (521 Views) TGJB 11/06/2004 04:57PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (462 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/06/2004 06:01PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (629 Views) Michael D. 11/06/2004 06:14PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (453 Views) TGJB 11/06/2004 07:30PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (448 Views) Michael D. 11/06/2004 08:28PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (496 Views) TGJB 11/06/2004 10:50PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (499 Views) miff 11/07/2004 09:49AM
Re: B.C. Numbers (411 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/07/2004 10:18AM
Re: B.C. Numbers (532 Views) ronwar 11/07/2004 01:04PM
Frankel and Strength (496 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/07/2004 04:20PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (507 Views) Michael D. 11/07/2004 10:46AM
Re: B.C. Numbers (488 Views) TGJB 11/07/2004 01:38PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (552 Views) 11/08/2004 11:37AM
Re: B.C. Numbers (386 Views) 11/08/2004 11:21AM
Re: B.C. Numbers (469 Views) asfufh 11/08/2004 11:47AM
World's Fastest Humans (573 Views) HP 11/08/2004 12:27PM
Re: World's Fastest Humans (539 Views) OPM 11/08/2004 12:48PM
Re: World's Fastest Humans (483 Views) TGJB 11/08/2004 01:28PM
Re: World's Fastest Humans (469 Views) HP 11/08/2004 01:52PM
Re: World's Fastest Humans (517 Views) Silver Charm 11/08/2004 01:56PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (502 Views) Michael D. 11/05/2004 11:18AM
Re: B.C. Numbers (555 Views) JR 11/05/2004 12:59AM
Re: B.C. Numbers (454 Views) TGJB 11/05/2004 01:43PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (479 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/05/2004 03:33PM
DUTROW'S NUTRITION PLAN (475 Views) miff 11/05/2004 05:46PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (667 Views) MO 11/07/2004 02:07PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (438 Views) richiebee 11/08/2004 03:31AM
Re: B.C. Numbers (474 Views) Frank 11/05/2004 05:43PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (447 Views) TGJB 11/05/2004 06:09PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (567 Views) Boscar Obarra 11/05/2004 09:16PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (505 Views) Silver Charm 11/05/2004 10:44PM
Re: B.C. Numbers (487 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/05/2004 10:47PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.