Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Unscientific Study (580 Views)
Posted by: Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: April 09, 2006 10:50PM

Silver Charm Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >I have no data, this was an eyeball study.
>
> You need to get your eyes checked.

Hey, the stats are there in the link. You just have to update them for Saturday in your head. In other words, you have to add lots more money to Baffert. He won 6 races Saturday. Two stakes. You can count the nominees, the dollars spent and the dollars earned if you wish. If I'm off, I'm not off by much.

> Lukas doesn't really have the client base any
> longer to be a big sales player and several of the
> Overbrooks are in the hands of former assistants
> Pletcher and Stewart.

Most of the Overbrooks are in Lukas's care. Its in the link.

> How has Shug been doing
> lately with Derby horses from all of those Phipps
> Blue Blood mares? Including the ones they didn't
> even nominate, are unraced, or the mare was
> barren.

Shug has one nominee per a quick persusal that has not started. Phipps stable has made a huge mistake in recent years in what stallion they send their mares to. Thats probably part of it. But my guess is Shug's averages better ROI with his one horse than all of Lukas's and Pletchers combined.

How about Farish? He's due.
>
> The point being this is not a very exact science
> and it is a rich mans game. Baffert didn't buy the
> $8.0M turtle, someone else did and gave it to him.
> Why should it count against his record. However he
> started with about 50 expensive well-bred two
> year-olds and will end up with two Derby runners.

> He probably has beaten the odds.

I believe Baffert had fewer nominees than Lukas, but he appeared to have spent more money. These horses are bid upon with consultation from the trainers in instances where they train for the buyer. Should a trainer be able to spot a bargain? Yeah he should. Should a trainer know when to dissuade a client from a horse. Yeah, I think he should. But thats certainly not a skill Lukas or his disciples have.

> If The Green Monkey doesn't win the Derby next
> year is it Pletchers fault.

Yes it most certainly is. The Green Monkey is a 16 million dollar Forestry isn't he and Pletcher has all the chemistry money can buy. You bet its his fault. He sure as hell better win and win big with that horse. Thats part of deal.




Subject Written By Posted
Unscientific Study (1013 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/09/2006 08:30PM
Re: Unscientific Study (590 Views) tmon 04/09/2006 08:45PM
Re: Unscientific Study (590 Views) Silver Charm 04/09/2006 09:17PM
Re: Unscientific Study (580 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/09/2006 10:50PM
Re: Unscientific Study (586 Views) richiebee 04/10/2006 04:14AM
Re: Unscientific Study (548 Views) Silver Charm 04/10/2006 10:51AM
Re: Unscientific Study (494 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 11:20AM
Re: Unscientific Study (503 Views) Silver Charm 04/10/2006 12:13PM
Re: Unscientific Study (509 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/11/2006 07:35PM
Re: Unscientific Study (700 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 11:03AM
Re: Unscientific Study (488 Views) magicnight 04/10/2006 11:21AM
Re: Unscientific Study (510 Views) richiebee 04/10/2006 11:52AM
Re: Unscientific Study (493 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 12:20PM
Re: Unscientific Study (481 Views) richiebee 04/10/2006 12:40PM
Re: Unscientific Study (491 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 01:02PM
Re: Unscientific Study (485 Views) bellsbendboy 04/10/2006 01:48PM
Re: Unscientific Study (496 Views) Silver Charm 04/10/2006 01:57PM
Re: Unscientific Study (506 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 02:39PM
Re: Unscientific Study (508 Views) bellsbendboy 04/10/2006 04:27PM
Re: Unscientific Study (482 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 05:01PM
Re: Unscientific Study (530 Views) miff 04/10/2006 01:58PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.