Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Unscientific Study (494 Views)
Posted by: Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: April 10, 2006 11:20AM

Silver Charm Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The real measure of success would be @sum(Total
> Purses won + Total stud fees earned + (Total Value
> of offspring - stud fee)) - (Total dollars spent
> at Sales + Total Value of home-breds raised
> (regardless if they race))= (Net Loss) or Profit
> on Racing Investment
>
> Give me that one and you have a valuation that is
> rellevant.


Total Value of Offspring - Stud Fee?

Thats not a equation that is relevant unless you're trying to calculate an estate and even then the Stallion owner would have to own the offspring. All that matters is money spent and money returned. Its like a day at the pari mutual windows. If an owner gets 50 million in syndication, yeah you count that. Even adding in the rare syndication windfalls Lukas is certainly a mega loser. The losiest. Do you think he'd invest his own money in the horses he recommends?

Baffert is a loser too, but not nearly as big a loser as Lukas and Coolmore. The key for them is they are losing the money of the wealthy and they stay in business latching onto a viable horse now and then. Its a "look at my one success" kind of thing. They are parasites.




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/10/2006 11:21AM by Chuckles_the_Clown2.



Subject Written By Posted
Unscientific Study (1013 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/09/2006 08:30PM
Re: Unscientific Study (590 Views) tmon 04/09/2006 08:45PM
Re: Unscientific Study (590 Views) Silver Charm 04/09/2006 09:17PM
Re: Unscientific Study (581 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/09/2006 10:50PM
Re: Unscientific Study (586 Views) richiebee 04/10/2006 04:14AM
Re: Unscientific Study (549 Views) Silver Charm 04/10/2006 10:51AM
Re: Unscientific Study (494 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 11:20AM
Re: Unscientific Study (503 Views) Silver Charm 04/10/2006 12:13PM
Re: Unscientific Study (509 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/11/2006 07:35PM
Re: Unscientific Study (700 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 11:03AM
Re: Unscientific Study (488 Views) magicnight 04/10/2006 11:21AM
Re: Unscientific Study (510 Views) richiebee 04/10/2006 11:52AM
Re: Unscientific Study (493 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 12:20PM
Re: Unscientific Study (481 Views) richiebee 04/10/2006 12:40PM
Re: Unscientific Study (491 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 01:02PM
Re: Unscientific Study (486 Views) bellsbendboy 04/10/2006 01:48PM
Re: Unscientific Study (497 Views) Silver Charm 04/10/2006 01:57PM
Re: Unscientific Study (506 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 02:39PM
Re: Unscientific Study (509 Views) bellsbendboy 04/10/2006 04:27PM
Re: Unscientific Study (483 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 05:01PM
Re: Unscientific Study (530 Views) miff 04/10/2006 01:58PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.