Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Unscientific Study (700 Views)
Posted by: Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: April 10, 2006 11:03AM

richiebee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Chucko del Sol:
>
> I know this is a Derby string, and your study
> was "unscientific", but nobody is going to compare
> you to Federico Tesio if you are going to make a
> statement like "Phipps stable has made a huge
> mistake in recent years in what stallion they send
> their mares to".
>
> Somehow, despite all this mismanagement, Team
> Phipps has produced among others, Personal Ensign,
> My Flag, Storm Flag Flying, Inside Information,
> Finder's Fee, Dancing Spree, Pleasant Home, etc.
>
> The emphasis for Phipps seems to be on the
> Breeders Cup rather than the Triple Crown, on
> developing a solid broodmare band instead of some
> fast and prematurely retired stallions. Pleasant
> Home is a fine example of the Phipps emphasis on
> the distaff side; she descends from one of the
> great runners/ producers in the last 25 years,
> the great Gold Beauty (Dayjur, Maplejinsky, etc)
>
> In terms of determining who burned the most cash
> on unfulfilled Derby dreams, maybe you should look
> to the (middle) East.
>
>
>
> Edited 1 times. Last edit at 04/10/06 05:06AM by
> richiebee.

Shug or Dinny, if you're tuning in...First off let me ask you what happened to Strong Goer in 1995?

Secondly, I think its imperative that you know I can be retained for breeding advice. Line breeding, return to the sire the best blood of his dam, statiscial nicking, breed the best to the best and hope for the best...these and others have been sometimes effective recipes. However, what modern breeding requires is special insight. Theres no Fredrico Tesio now and if there was he'd be about as effective as some of the big name trainers spending huge amounts of money for brittle and short distance horses at the sales.

You did fine with Pleasant Home, but if you're honest with yourselves you have to acquiesce that things have not been going well. For instance, the last two foals of this horse were not good mating choices:

http://www.pedigreequery.com/progeny/versailles+treaty

This horse has been nicked poorly, even considering Storm Flag. Juvenile races are nice. But was this horse bred to win the Oaks and Distaff or maybe even a Triple Crown race vs. the boys?:

http://www.pedigreequery.com/progeny/my+flag2

Heres another one of your wonderful mares that has gotten a couple runners. But were they really the type of runners you're after?

http://www.pedigreequery.com/index.php?query_type=progeny&search_bar=progeny&wsid=1142716229&h=HEAVENLY%20PRIZE&filter=All+Horses&cf=&sort=&pedloggedin=0

What about the recent choices for his great mare? Monarchos? Kingambo? Unbridled was a good horse if you like them crooked.

http://www.pedigreequery.com/progeny/personal+ensign

Its fitting to end with this one Ap Indy and Dynaformer?

http://www.pedigreequery.com/progeny/finders+fee

Heres my challenge, with your pool of mares and allowed to select the stallions for all one year you will have two in the Derby and one in the Oaks. If you don't I pay you. You'd never have gotten that arrangement from Tesio.

If you think Keyed Entry is a great horse with a great chance, you won't want to retain me. If you think your single T.C. nominee has what it takes to perhaps win the Travers, you dont want me either. However, if multiple triple crown nominees are your goal and you really want to win that Derby I am available for a contigency fee, but I would be selecting the mates for the entire stable.









Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/10/2006 11:29AM by Chuckles_the_Clown2.



Subject Written By Posted
Unscientific Study (1014 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/09/2006 08:30PM
Re: Unscientific Study (590 Views) tmon 04/09/2006 08:45PM
Re: Unscientific Study (590 Views) Silver Charm 04/09/2006 09:17PM
Re: Unscientific Study (581 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/09/2006 10:50PM
Re: Unscientific Study (586 Views) richiebee 04/10/2006 04:14AM
Re: Unscientific Study (549 Views) Silver Charm 04/10/2006 10:51AM
Re: Unscientific Study (495 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 11:20AM
Re: Unscientific Study (503 Views) Silver Charm 04/10/2006 12:13PM
Re: Unscientific Study (509 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/11/2006 07:35PM
Re: Unscientific Study (700 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 11:03AM
Re: Unscientific Study (489 Views) magicnight 04/10/2006 11:21AM
Re: Unscientific Study (510 Views) richiebee 04/10/2006 11:52AM
Re: Unscientific Study (493 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 12:20PM
Re: Unscientific Study (481 Views) richiebee 04/10/2006 12:40PM
Re: Unscientific Study (491 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 01:02PM
Re: Unscientific Study (486 Views) bellsbendboy 04/10/2006 01:48PM
Re: Unscientific Study (497 Views) Silver Charm 04/10/2006 01:57PM
Re: Unscientific Study (506 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 02:39PM
Re: Unscientific Study (509 Views) bellsbendboy 04/10/2006 04:27PM
Re: Unscientific Study (483 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/10/2006 05:01PM
Re: Unscientific Study (530 Views) miff 04/10/2006 01:58PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.