Re: Figure Study (524 Views)
Posted by:
NoCarolinaTony (IP Logged)
Date: July 19, 2006 12:01AM
So to take it a step further you are saying the negative or (slower perforamcne) in this case is a random accurance or an anomolly (flier) and should not be considered. I do not think your assumption will pass the Stats board as being valid.
NC Tony
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 07/19/2006 07:34PM by NoCarolinaTony.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.