As far as I'm concerned, Trevino got it right when he observed that most golf bets were decided on the 1st tee. If I remember correctly, one of David's methodology arguments was that TG's method results in too many noncontenders looking like they have a chance, whereas Rags tend to eliminate these horses. The flip side of course is that Rags' method eliminates many horses who actually win, often at long odds. I'm not saying that the pts system was selected with this in mind, although I must admit that the thought crossed my mind.

Given that you have allowed David to select, probably coincidentally, a pt system which is consistent with his methodology argument, there is no reason I can see for you not to select the track or tracks. There was mention earlier of the inflated Rags' nos at Del & Pim, which seems to be consistent with what I've seen recently. Assuming you have some familiarity with either, perhaps one or both should be on your short list. Mtr might also be worthy of consideration. Nor have I seen anything in the rules thus far which prohibits you from consultations regarding your selection. Choose wisely HP, as your undefeated record & legacy are both hanging in the balance.