Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Modesty Stakes Churchill May 3, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (696 Views)
Posted by: David Patent (IP Logged)
Date: December 16, 2002 06:37PM

Silver Charm wrote:

"TGJB you have now shed some light on why Chilluki was such a prohibitive at Gulfstream in the BC Juvenile Filly.
Your numbers showed her as being only modestly fast (straight 7's) and she had distance limitations. If Ragozin gave her a number in that first race then the Ragozin players had to be fooled into believing that she was cycling back to this number. Wonder if Ragozin gave his players a refund after the race was run?"

Silver: On the Ragozin Sheets, Chilukki never got back to her first race number during her 2 y.o. year and by the time the BC rolled around, her limitations had been grossly exposed on Ragozin sheets too. Her other numbers were no faster than the rest of the field and she was a big underlay on the Sheets. Anyone who was holding out for her to get back to that first number given what she had done in subsequent races deserved what they got.

I am not going to opine as to what the 'right' number was for her first race, but regardless of one's view, since she earned her number at 4 1/2f I don't see how one could have used that race to predict much of anything as she developed down the road. The number Ragozin gave her (a 6-, I believe), was the kind of number that figured to set her back for some time. She did, though, break through that first Ragozin number substantially as a 3 y.o.



Subject Written By Posted
Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (1135 Views) Mall 12/13/2002 12:53PM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (740 Views) TGJB 12/13/2002 04:50PM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (704 Views) Silver Charm 12/13/2002 07:19PM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (827 Views) TGJB 12/13/2002 08:05PM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (694 Views) Mall 12/13/2002 10:15PM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (676 Views) nunzio 12/14/2002 10:48AM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (714 Views) Silver Charm 12/14/2002 01:51PM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (677 Views) nunzio 12/14/2002 02:15PM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (712 Views) mike holbert 12/14/2002 05:17PM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (696 Views) David Patent 12/16/2002 06:37PM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (719 Views) TGJB 12/16/2002 07:34PM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (689 Views) David Patent 12/18/2002 04:56PM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (14872 Views) Silver Charm 12/18/2002 05:47PM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (672 Views) David Patent 12/18/2002 11:46PM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (713 Views) gaaaaaining grooooound 12/19/2002 03:03AM
Calendar Crack (728 Views) TGJB 12/19/2002 03:38PM
????? (674 Views) gaaaaaining grooooound 12/20/2002 06:46AM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (690 Views) Michael D. 12/19/2002 01:15PM
Re: Measuring The Variant Objectively.? (725 Views) Silver Charm 12/19/2002 02:33PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.