Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Laurel 2/22 (933 Views)
Posted by: TGJB (IP Logged)
Date: February 28, 2003 04:29PM

Saw the fractions when I watched the races, yes, yes, don't know or care and it obviouly would be different for horses running zero's than horses running 25's. Incidentally, it nets out the same whether you view the track as changing or that it was a "pace" race-- you have to do it at a different variant either way, as we do for slow pace races all the time. And no, this does not mean I think we should be giving out quit figures, although you are certainly free to do so.

Should the fillies who came from off the pace be treated as though they were racing over a faster track, one the same speed as for the Gen. George? If so they will get really slow numbers, out of character with their histories. This is the biggest difference conceptually between hot/slow paced races-- when there is a really slow pace, ALL the horses are running slowly.

Kraven, who until recently used Ragozin numbers, had some interesting comments in an e-mail to me about how those slow pace races are screwing up Rags turf numbers, and he may want to get involved in this discussion. Or, he may not.



TGJB



Subject Written By Posted
Laurel 2/22 (1286 Views) TGJB 02/27/2003 05:52PM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (751 Views) Michael D. 02/27/2003 06:21PM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (723 Views) TGJB 02/27/2003 06:29PM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (749 Views) The Kid 02/27/2003 08:38PM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (782 Views) TGJB 02/28/2003 01:08PM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (788 Views) Alydar in California 02/28/2003 08:24AM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (812 Views) mholbert 02/28/2003 10:01AM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (752 Views) Silver Charm 02/28/2003 11:32AM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (782 Views) TGJB 02/28/2003 01:20PM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (792 Views) Alydar in California 02/28/2003 02:12PM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (786 Views) TGJB 02/28/2003 03:12PM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (830 Views) Alydar in California 02/28/2003 03:36PM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (758 Views) Alydar in California 02/28/2003 03:49PM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (933 Views) TGJB 02/28/2003 04:29PM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (763 Views) Silver Charm 03/03/2003 06:44PM
Friedman Admits-Avoid Comparisons (780 Views) Silver Charm 03/03/2003 06:56PM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (787 Views) mholbert 03/04/2003 10:52AM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (789 Views) TGJB 03/04/2003 02:49PM
Re: Laurel 2/22 (791 Views) mholbert 03/04/2003 03:20PM
fatigue model (803 Views) derby1592 03/05/2003 01:22AM
Re: fatigue model (834 Views) mholbert 03/06/2003 09:55AM
Re: fatigue model (817 Views) derby1592 03/06/2003 10:44PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.