Fairmount1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wrongly1 wrote: "We all know who Peter Miller is
> and why that horse popped a big number."
>
> HARD WORK.
> UP EARLY IN THE MORNINGS.
> LET'S A HORSE BE A HORSE.
>
> Those are the only ones I can think of that would
> add up to a negative six.....
>
> If you question Jerry's number by the way
> (bobphilo), then you better question Beyer also.
> “It is the highest figure we’ve ever assigned
> to a turf race,..." Do you really think JB and
> Beyer both got it wrong? I haven't look at
> Timeform or Bris; maybe others can weigh in on how
> those two saw the race.
>
> https://www.drf.com/news/jerardi-stormy-liberals-1
> 19-beyer-one-books

I am not questioning Jerry's number. I'm actually defending the possibility of a 6YO horses ability to run a big new top against all those that think he's too old. I'm defending his number but he's taking it as an insult. It's those that can't believe the number that are criticizing Jerry's figure making accuracy.

TimeformUS is giving it a 128. I'm asking Craig there what the horse's previous figures were and what he thinks about this.