Bet Twice Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I have no problem with the number. My issue is
> and was with you spouting off with some ridiculous
> argument, which at this point, I’m not even sure
> what that argument is. Probably best to let this
> go at this point.

What ridiculous argument am I putting forth? The only way for the figure to be correct is that it is possible for a 6YO horse can run such a big new top. I am defending the figure by proving that a 6Y0 horse can run such a race. If you don't believe that you are the one questioning Jerry's figure. If you have trouble interpreting the study just look at the chart that shows the horses' Beyers peak at 4.45 and decline very slowly in the following years.That is just the average horse. About half of all horses peak even later.