Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  Belmont Stakes Day FInal Figures Belmont 20 June 2020 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Racing economics (661 Views)
Posted by: BitPlayer (IP Logged)
Date: June 25, 2019 10:04AM

Interesting post. I think any serious discussion of improving equine safety and welfare has to focus eventually on economics. The claiming game seems like it is essentially a game of hot potato. Take the case of Kochees, who was claimed by Hollendorfer and eventually broke down while racing at Santa Anita. A CNN article featured the following from the prior owner of Kochees:

Herbertson says he was about to give the 8-year-old horse -- a veteran in racing terms -- a break but decided to enter him in the claiming race in November. "He definitely had some nicks and needed time off," Herbertson told CNN.

What the article does not mention is that Herbertson entered Kochees for $25K after racing him for 62.5K and 32K in his prior three races. Sounds to me like he was trying to rid himself of the hot potato. Hollendorfer bit.

Less attention-grabbing than the issue of on-track fatalities is the issue of after care. What happens to all the horses who don't break down, but simply bow a tendon or cannot withstand the rigors of training? It would be nice to think that they all find other occupations or at least a healthy farm life, but I doubt that is the case.

It seems to me that there needs to be a secure outlet for horses that have reached the end of their racing days, so that the last owner is not faced with either being stuck with a hot potato or taking steps that put the horse in jeopardy. Perhaps there needs to be a requirement that thoroughbreds have the equivalent of prepaid long-term care insurance in order to be registered. Putting this cost at the beginning of a horse's life rather than at the end would have the direct or indirect effect of shifting some of the burden to breeders and pinhookers, who I assume are actually profiting from the game. It would also probably have the effect of reducing the foal crop and, indirectly, the number of races that are run, which I think is inevitable.



Subject Written By Posted
bc question (942 Views) vired 06/24/2019 01:36PM
Re: bc question (678 Views) twoshoes 06/24/2019 06:48PM
Re: bc question (641 Views) BitPlayer 06/24/2019 06:48PM
Re: bc question (545 Views) Bet Twice 06/24/2019 10:49PM
Re: bc question (555 Views) Strike 06/24/2019 09:20PM
Re: bc question (559 Views) vired 06/24/2019 10:02PM
Re: bc question (569 Views) Strike 06/24/2019 10:26PM
Re: Racing economics (661 Views) BitPlayer 06/25/2019 10:04AM
Re: Racing economics (558 Views) jerry 06/30/2019 09:36AM
Re: Racing economics (562 Views) Rich Curtis 06/30/2019 01:58PM
Re: Racing economics (447 Views) Bet Twice 07/01/2019 11:09PM
Re: Racing economics (515 Views) jerry 07/01/2019 11:38PM
Re: Racing economics (490 Views) Rich Curtis 07/02/2019 09:51AM
Re: Racing economics (473 Views) Strike 07/02/2019 05:49PM
Re: bc question (524 Views) Tavasco 06/24/2019 10:33PM
Re: bc question (497 Views) vired 06/24/2019 10:50PM
Re: bc question (518 Views) rezlegal 06/24/2019 10:17PM
Re: bc question (508 Views) Strike 06/24/2019 10:37PM
Re: bc question (446 Views) Edgorman 06/25/2019 07:00AM
Re: bc question (498 Views) Rich Curtis 06/25/2019 09:02AM
Re: bc question (491 Views) Strike 06/25/2019 11:41AM
Re: bc question (558 Views) Rich Curtis 06/25/2019 12:34PM
Re: bc question (538 Views) FrankD. 06/26/2019 06:06AM
Re: bc question (594 Views) FrankD. 06/26/2019 06:38AM
Re: bc question (508 Views) rezlegal 06/26/2019 07:43AM
Re: bc question (470 Views) rezlegal 06/26/2019 07:45AM
Re: bc question (454 Views) rezlegal 06/26/2019 08:11AM
Re: bc question (381 Views) Strike 06/26/2019 11:56AM
Re: bc question (450 Views) Rich Curtis 06/26/2019 12:51PM
Re: bc question (459 Views) Strike 06/26/2019 11:46AM
Re: bc question (498 Views) FrankD. 06/26/2019 06:15PM
Re: bc question (425 Views) albatross 06/26/2019 07:16PM
Re: bc question (395 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 03:41PM
Re: bc question (368 Views) albatross 06/27/2019 03:56PM
Re: bc question (417 Views) Fairmount1 06/27/2019 05:10PM
Re: bc question (426 Views) richiebee 06/27/2019 05:27PM
Re: bc question (403 Views) Rich Curtis 06/27/2019 06:29PM
Re: bc question (404 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 07:49PM
Re: bc question (363 Views) richiebee 06/27/2019 08:48PM
Re: bc question (345 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 09:22PM
Re: bc question (375 Views) richiebee 06/27/2019 09:33PM
Re: bc question (375 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 09:37PM
Re: bc question (358 Views) Rich Curtis 06/28/2019 06:33PM
Re: bc question (373 Views) albatross 06/27/2019 11:12PM
Re: bc question (425 Views) Fairmount1 06/27/2019 10:06PM
Re: bc question (413 Views) JimP 06/28/2019 07:30AM
Re: bc question (365 Views) Rich Curtis 06/28/2019 04:55PM
Re: bc question (351 Views) kencbs 06/28/2019 10:29PM
Re: bc question (365 Views) johnnym 06/29/2019 09:27AM
Re: bc question (385 Views) richiebee 06/29/2019 10:51AM
Re: bc question (425 Views) johnnym 06/29/2019 02:42PM
Re: bc question (403 Views) Rich Curtis 06/29/2019 03:21PM
Re: bc question (421 Views) Strike 06/29/2019 01:18PM
betting opportunity! (579 Views) skitimber 06/29/2019 09:50AM
Re: betting opportunity! (480 Views) johnnym 06/29/2019 10:40AM
Re: betting opportunity! (553 Views) Fairmount1 06/29/2019 11:46AM
Re: betting opportunity! (613 Views) skitimber 06/29/2019 01:57PM
Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (488 Views) toppled 07/06/2019 01:07AM
Think 1989 World Series (496 Views) skitimber 07/06/2019 06:54AM
Re: Think 1989 World Series (385 Views) P-Dub 07/06/2019 04:46PM
Re: Think 1989 World Series (379 Views) P-Dub 07/06/2019 04:47PM
Re: Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (399 Views) bluechip21 07/06/2019 08:18PM
Re: Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (324 Views) toppled 07/06/2019 10:33PM
Re: Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (389 Views) P-Dub 07/07/2019 02:11AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.