Re: bc question (867 Views)
Posted by: Strike (IP Logged)
Date: June 26, 2019 11:46AM

rezlegal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> and before that the infamous William Morey! and so
> it goes.


"The California Horse Racing Board on Tuesday filed a complaint against trainer William Morey alleging violation of CHRB Rules 1843.5 (i) and 1629 pursuant to Rule 1887.

The complaint further alleges that Morey's assistant trainer administered a substance containing an alkalinizing agent via a dose syringe to two horses that were entered to race at Santa Anita Park that same day, March 29, 2019.

Alkalinizing agents can raise the TCO2 levels of horses, which may reduce lactic acid buildup and prevent muscle fatigue.

[b]March 29 was the first day of racing at Santa Anita since March 3 after track officials ordered a self-imposed hiatus[/b] due to a spike in equine fatalities during racing and training since the meet's opening day on Dec. 26.."


At least this is a start. Unbelievable that his barn would do such a stupid thing the very first day back after the track was closed.



Subject Written By Posted
bc question (1574 Views) vired 06/24/2019 01:36PM
Re: bc question (1101 Views) twoshoes 06/24/2019 06:48PM
Re: bc question (1032 Views) BitPlayer 06/24/2019 06:48PM
Re: bc question (1030 Views) Bet Twice 06/24/2019 10:49PM
Re: bc question (956 Views) Strike 06/24/2019 09:20PM
Re: bc question (949 Views) vired 06/24/2019 10:02PM
Re: bc question (967 Views) Strike 06/24/2019 10:26PM
Re: Racing economics (1051 Views) BitPlayer 06/25/2019 10:04AM
Re: Racing economics (974 Views) jerry 06/30/2019 09:36AM
Re: Racing economics (960 Views) Rich Curtis 06/30/2019 01:58PM
Re: Racing economics (848 Views) Bet Twice 07/01/2019 11:09PM
Re: Racing economics (919 Views) jerry 07/01/2019 11:38PM
Re: Racing economics (1036 Views) Rich Curtis 07/02/2019 09:51AM
Re: Racing economics (875 Views) Strike 07/02/2019 05:49PM
Re: bc question (1008 Views) Tavasco 06/24/2019 10:33PM
Re: bc question (976 Views) vired 06/24/2019 10:50PM
Re: bc question (910 Views) rezlegal 06/24/2019 10:17PM
Re: bc question (936 Views) Strike 06/24/2019 10:37PM
Re: bc question (882 Views) Edgorman 06/25/2019 07:00AM
Re: bc question (922 Views) Rich Curtis 06/25/2019 09:02AM
Re: bc question (876 Views) Strike 06/25/2019 11:41AM
Re: bc question (987 Views) Rich Curtis 06/25/2019 12:34PM
Re: bc question (957 Views) FrankD. 06/26/2019 06:06AM
Re: bc question (980 Views) FrankD. 06/26/2019 06:38AM
Re: bc question (936 Views) rezlegal 06/26/2019 07:43AM
Re: bc question (1081 Views) rezlegal 06/26/2019 07:45AM
Re: bc question (825 Views) rezlegal 06/26/2019 08:11AM
Re: bc question (749 Views) Strike 06/26/2019 11:56AM
Re: bc question (854 Views) Rich Curtis 06/26/2019 12:51PM
Re: bc question (867 Views) Strike 06/26/2019 11:46AM
Re: bc question (920 Views) FrankD. 06/26/2019 06:15PM
Re: bc question (800 Views) albatross 06/26/2019 07:16PM
Re: bc question (767 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 03:41PM
Re: bc question (724 Views) albatross 06/27/2019 03:56PM
Re: bc question (789 Views) Fairmount1 06/27/2019 05:10PM
Re: bc question (789 Views) richiebee 06/27/2019 05:27PM
Re: bc question (785 Views) Rich Curtis 06/27/2019 06:29PM
Re: bc question (819 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 07:49PM
Re: bc question (732 Views) richiebee 06/27/2019 08:48PM
Re: bc question (844 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 09:22PM
Re: bc question (817 Views) richiebee 06/27/2019 09:33PM
Re: bc question (861 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 09:37PM
Re: bc question (742 Views) Rich Curtis 06/28/2019 06:33PM
Re: bc question (779 Views) albatross 06/27/2019 11:12PM
Re: bc question (806 Views) Fairmount1 06/27/2019 10:06PM
Re: bc question (780 Views) JimP 06/28/2019 07:30AM
Re: bc question (730 Views) Rich Curtis 06/28/2019 04:55PM
Re: bc question (733 Views) kencbs 06/28/2019 10:29PM
Re: bc question (770 Views) johnnym 06/29/2019 09:27AM
Re: bc question (813 Views) richiebee 06/29/2019 10:51AM
Re: bc question (849 Views) johnnym 06/29/2019 02:42PM
Re: bc question (824 Views) Rich Curtis 06/29/2019 03:21PM
Re: bc question (837 Views) Strike 06/29/2019 01:18PM
betting opportunity! (954 Views) skitimber 06/29/2019 09:50AM
Re: betting opportunity! (878 Views) johnnym 06/29/2019 10:40AM
Re: betting opportunity! (997 Views) Fairmount1 06/29/2019 11:46AM
Re: betting opportunity! (1026 Views) skitimber 06/29/2019 01:57PM
Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (940 Views) toppled 07/06/2019 01:07AM
Think 1989 World Series (906 Views) skitimber 07/06/2019 06:54AM
Re: Think 1989 World Series (843 Views) P-Dub 07/06/2019 04:46PM
Re: Think 1989 World Series (759 Views) P-Dub 07/06/2019 04:47PM
Re: Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (794 Views) bluechip21 07/06/2019 08:18PM
Re: Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (701 Views) toppled 07/06/2019 10:33PM
Re: Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (791 Views) P-Dub 07/07/2019 02:11AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.