Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Hockessin Stakes Delaware Park, Race 6, July 13, 2019 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: bc question (266 Views)
Posted by: Strike (IP Logged)
Date: June 26, 2019 11:46AM

rezlegal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> and before that the infamous William Morey! and so
> it goes.


"The California Horse Racing Board on Tuesday filed a complaint against trainer William Morey alleging violation of CHRB Rules 1843.5 (i) and 1629 pursuant to Rule 1887.

The complaint further alleges that Morey's assistant trainer administered a substance containing an alkalinizing agent via a dose syringe to two horses that were entered to race at Santa Anita Park that same day, March 29, 2019.

Alkalinizing agents can raise the TCO2 levels of horses, which may reduce lactic acid buildup and prevent muscle fatigue.

March 29 was the first day of racing at Santa Anita since March 3 after track officials ordered a self-imposed hiatus due to a spike in equine fatalities during racing and training since the meet's opening day on Dec. 26.."


At least this is a start. Unbelievable that his barn would do such a stupid thing the very first day back after the track was closed.



Subject Written By Posted
bc question (710 Views) vired 06/24/2019 01:36PM
Re: bc question (509 Views) twoshoes 06/24/2019 06:48PM
Re: bc question (460 Views) BitPlayer 06/24/2019 06:48PM
Re: bc question (404 Views) Bet Twice 06/24/2019 10:49PM
Re: bc question (395 Views) Strike 06/24/2019 09:20PM
Re: bc question (357 Views) vired 06/24/2019 10:02PM
Re: bc question (377 Views) Strike 06/24/2019 10:26PM
Re: Racing economics (498 Views) BitPlayer 06/25/2019 10:04AM
Re: Racing economics (355 Views) jerry 06/30/2019 09:36AM
Re: Racing economics (355 Views) Rich Curtis 06/30/2019 01:58PM
Re: Racing economics (300 Views) Bet Twice 07/01/2019 11:09PM
Re: Racing economics (309 Views) jerry 07/01/2019 11:38PM
Re: Racing economics (329 Views) Rich Curtis 07/02/2019 09:51AM
Re: Racing economics (338 Views) Strike 07/02/2019 05:49PM
Re: bc question (376 Views) Tavasco 06/24/2019 10:33PM
Re: bc question (321 Views) vired 06/24/2019 10:50PM
Re: bc question (346 Views) rezlegal 06/24/2019 10:17PM
Re: bc question (332 Views) Strike 06/24/2019 10:37PM
Re: bc question (304 Views) Edgorman 06/25/2019 07:00AM
Re: bc question (328 Views) Rich Curtis 06/25/2019 09:02AM
Re: bc question (335 Views) Strike 06/25/2019 11:41AM
Re: bc question (353 Views) Rich Curtis 06/25/2019 12:34PM
Re: bc question (364 Views) FrankD. 06/26/2019 06:06AM
Re: bc question (364 Views) FrankD. 06/26/2019 06:38AM
Re: bc question (303 Views) rezlegal 06/26/2019 07:43AM
Re: bc question (276 Views) rezlegal 06/26/2019 07:45AM
Re: bc question (290 Views) rezlegal 06/26/2019 08:11AM
Re: bc question (253 Views) Strike 06/26/2019 11:56AM
Re: bc question (291 Views) Rich Curtis 06/26/2019 12:51PM
Re: bc question (266 Views) Strike 06/26/2019 11:46AM
Re: bc question (367 Views) FrankD. 06/26/2019 06:15PM
Re: bc question (313 Views) albatross 06/26/2019 07:16PM
Re: bc question (267 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 03:41PM
Re: bc question (243 Views) albatross 06/27/2019 03:56PM
Re: bc question (279 Views) Fairmount1 06/27/2019 05:10PM
Re: bc question (282 Views) richiebee 06/27/2019 05:27PM
Re: bc question (270 Views) Rich Curtis 06/27/2019 06:29PM
Re: bc question (278 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 07:49PM
Re: bc question (240 Views) richiebee 06/27/2019 08:48PM
Re: bc question (212 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 09:22PM
Re: bc question (260 Views) richiebee 06/27/2019 09:33PM
Re: bc question (247 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 09:37PM
Re: bc question (235 Views) Rich Curtis 06/28/2019 06:33PM
Re: bc question (249 Views) albatross 06/27/2019 11:12PM
Re: bc question (288 Views) Fairmount1 06/27/2019 10:06PM
Re: bc question (266 Views) JimP 06/28/2019 07:30AM
Re: bc question (245 Views) Rich Curtis 06/28/2019 04:55PM
Re: bc question (234 Views) kencbs 06/28/2019 10:29PM
Re: bc question (218 Views) johnnym 06/29/2019 09:27AM
Re: bc question (244 Views) richiebee 06/29/2019 10:51AM
Re: bc question (231 Views) johnnym 06/29/2019 02:42PM
Re: bc question (245 Views) Rich Curtis 06/29/2019 03:21PM
Re: bc question (209 Views) Strike 06/29/2019 01:18PM
betting opportunity! (416 Views) skitimber 06/29/2019 09:50AM
Re: betting opportunity! (331 Views) johnnym 06/29/2019 10:40AM
Re: betting opportunity! (352 Views) Fairmount1 06/29/2019 11:46AM
Re: betting opportunity! (316 Views) skitimber 06/29/2019 01:57PM
Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (293 Views) toppled 07/06/2019 01:07AM
Think 1989 World Series (293 Views) skitimber 07/06/2019 06:54AM
Re: Think 1989 World Series (212 Views) P-Dub 07/06/2019 04:46PM
Re: Think 1989 World Series (191 Views) P-Dub 07/06/2019 04:47PM
Re: Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (232 Views) bluechip21 07/06/2019 08:18PM
Re: Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (200 Views) toppled 07/06/2019 10:33PM
Re: Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (258 Views) P-Dub 07/07/2019 02:11AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.