Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Hockessin Stakes Delaware Park, Race 6, July 13, 2019 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: bc question (353 Views)
Posted by: Rich Curtis (IP Logged)
Date: June 25, 2019 12:34PM

"The NFL made a dramatic turn in the right direction when they acknowledged the damage to players that concussions were causing."

The NFL does the right thing only after it has exhausted the alternatives. Then it demands credit and expects people not to laugh. Take a look at the Steelers' offensive line in the mid-1970s. You've got these guys (Clack, Kolb, Webster) bench pressing over 500 pounds and they aren't even weightlifters. They are football players whose bodies get beaten to a pulp. This was at the same time that the Arnold Schwarzenegger documentary Pumping Iron came out. The book of the same name discusses steroids in detail. Any idiot could see what was going on there. And it is still going on in the NFL today--in modified form. Anybody who doubts this should Google the "drug-tested" 1990 Mr Olympia contest and watch a Youtube video of these "clean" athletes.

"I wish there was one national authority to rule the sport of horse racing"

What if the "one national authority" sucks?

"Dr. Sue Stover, a professor and veterinarian from UC Davis, says that more than 85% of horses that break down on the track had a pre-existing issue that was exacerbated."

What percentage of horses who did not break down on the track had pre-existing issues?

"I hope I don't come off as speaking from a soapbox."

Not in the least. I appreciate your post. My point is that anybody who looks at a day's worth of results will see performances from a lot of horses whose trainers have precisely one excuse: They did NOT know everything.

And finally: Some trainers are extremely smart and caring. They are great people. And some trainers are scumbags. And some trainers are idiots. In total, when trainers start to talk about their horses before a race, all of my instincts are to run away. As a group, what these guys know is much closer to nothing than to everything.



Subject Written By Posted
bc question (711 Views) vired 06/24/2019 01:36PM
Re: bc question (509 Views) twoshoes 06/24/2019 06:48PM
Re: bc question (461 Views) BitPlayer 06/24/2019 06:48PM
Re: bc question (404 Views) Bet Twice 06/24/2019 10:49PM
Re: bc question (395 Views) Strike 06/24/2019 09:20PM
Re: bc question (357 Views) vired 06/24/2019 10:02PM
Re: bc question (377 Views) Strike 06/24/2019 10:26PM
Re: Racing economics (498 Views) BitPlayer 06/25/2019 10:04AM
Re: Racing economics (355 Views) jerry 06/30/2019 09:36AM
Re: Racing economics (355 Views) Rich Curtis 06/30/2019 01:58PM
Re: Racing economics (300 Views) Bet Twice 07/01/2019 11:09PM
Re: Racing economics (309 Views) jerry 07/01/2019 11:38PM
Re: Racing economics (330 Views) Rich Curtis 07/02/2019 09:51AM
Re: Racing economics (338 Views) Strike 07/02/2019 05:49PM
Re: bc question (376 Views) Tavasco 06/24/2019 10:33PM
Re: bc question (321 Views) vired 06/24/2019 10:50PM
Re: bc question (346 Views) rezlegal 06/24/2019 10:17PM
Re: bc question (333 Views) Strike 06/24/2019 10:37PM
Re: bc question (304 Views) Edgorman 06/25/2019 07:00AM
Re: bc question (329 Views) Rich Curtis 06/25/2019 09:02AM
Re: bc question (335 Views) Strike 06/25/2019 11:41AM
Re: bc question (353 Views) Rich Curtis 06/25/2019 12:34PM
Re: bc question (365 Views) FrankD. 06/26/2019 06:06AM
Re: bc question (364 Views) FrankD. 06/26/2019 06:38AM
Re: bc question (303 Views) rezlegal 06/26/2019 07:43AM
Re: bc question (276 Views) rezlegal 06/26/2019 07:45AM
Re: bc question (291 Views) rezlegal 06/26/2019 08:11AM
Re: bc question (253 Views) Strike 06/26/2019 11:56AM
Re: bc question (291 Views) Rich Curtis 06/26/2019 12:51PM
Re: bc question (267 Views) Strike 06/26/2019 11:46AM
Re: bc question (367 Views) FrankD. 06/26/2019 06:15PM
Re: bc question (314 Views) albatross 06/26/2019 07:16PM
Re: bc question (267 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 03:41PM
Re: bc question (244 Views) albatross 06/27/2019 03:56PM
Re: bc question (279 Views) Fairmount1 06/27/2019 05:10PM
Re: bc question (282 Views) richiebee 06/27/2019 05:27PM
Re: bc question (270 Views) Rich Curtis 06/27/2019 06:29PM
Re: bc question (278 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 07:49PM
Re: bc question (240 Views) richiebee 06/27/2019 08:48PM
Re: bc question (213 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 09:22PM
Re: bc question (260 Views) richiebee 06/27/2019 09:33PM
Re: bc question (247 Views) johnnym 06/27/2019 09:37PM
Re: bc question (235 Views) Rich Curtis 06/28/2019 06:33PM
Re: bc question (249 Views) albatross 06/27/2019 11:12PM
Re: bc question (288 Views) Fairmount1 06/27/2019 10:06PM
Re: bc question (266 Views) JimP 06/28/2019 07:30AM
Re: bc question (245 Views) Rich Curtis 06/28/2019 04:55PM
Re: bc question (234 Views) kencbs 06/28/2019 10:29PM
Re: bc question (218 Views) johnnym 06/29/2019 09:27AM
Re: bc question (244 Views) richiebee 06/29/2019 10:51AM
Re: bc question (231 Views) johnnym 06/29/2019 02:42PM
Re: bc question (245 Views) Rich Curtis 06/29/2019 03:21PM
Re: bc question (209 Views) Strike 06/29/2019 01:18PM
betting opportunity! (417 Views) skitimber 06/29/2019 09:50AM
Re: betting opportunity! (331 Views) johnnym 06/29/2019 10:40AM
Re: betting opportunity! (352 Views) Fairmount1 06/29/2019 11:46AM
Re: betting opportunity! (316 Views) skitimber 06/29/2019 01:57PM
Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (293 Views) toppled 07/06/2019 01:07AM
Think 1989 World Series (293 Views) skitimber 07/06/2019 06:54AM
Re: Think 1989 World Series (212 Views) P-Dub 07/06/2019 04:46PM
Re: Think 1989 World Series (192 Views) P-Dub 07/06/2019 04:47PM
Re: Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (232 Views) bluechip21 07/06/2019 08:18PM
Re: Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (201 Views) toppled 07/06/2019 10:33PM
Re: Kentucky isn't getting earthquakes (259 Views) P-Dub 07/07/2019 02:11AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.