Re: Will pays totally worng (735 Views)
Posted by: Fairmount1 (IP Logged)
Date: September 13, 2020 07:58AM

Rez,

Hope you are well. No Saratoga to catch up with anyone this year as backyard fans.

What if the gambler on leg 5 decided that he would hedge and placed bets to guarantee a profit to himself by placing bets on 3 uncovered runners let's say for an additional amount of capital? Wouldn't this fall under some promissory estoppel or detrimental reliance theory that he could at least recover these amounts back? I think ADW would be forced to pay back these extra amounts gambled in that scenario. Is it worth the time and effort is a different question.



Subject Written By Posted
Will pays totally worng (1178 Views) wrongly1 09/12/2020 08:26PM
Re: Will pays totally worng (792 Views) rezlegal 09/12/2020 09:08PM
Re: Will pays totally worng (735 Views) Fairmount1 09/13/2020 07:58AM
Re: Will pays totally worng (705 Views) rezlegal 09/13/2020 12:48PM
Re: Will pays totally worng (768 Views) BitPlayer 09/12/2020 11:27PM
Re: Will pays totally worng (698 Views) wrongly1 09/13/2020 09:16AM
Re: Will pays totally wrong (666 Views) BitPlayer 09/13/2020 09:45AM
Re: Will pays totally wrong (687 Views) wrongly1 09/13/2020 10:18AM
Re: Will pays totally wrong (699 Views) BitPlayer 09/13/2020 12:25PM
Re: Will pays totally wrong (671 Views) wrongly1 09/14/2020 12:18AM
Re: Will pays totally wrong (708 Views) P-Dub 09/15/2020 01:25AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.