Re: Will pays totally wrong (667 Views)
Posted by: BitPlayer (IP Logged)
Date: September 13, 2020 09:45AM
Look at the Equibase chart you linked to. The winning numbers in the last leg were 9/11/14/15/16/1. If the 9 had not been the post-time favorite, then 9 would have been the only winning number, and the payoff would have been higher. Ed DeRosa gives the same explanation in the Twitter thread you linked to.
| Subject | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|
 Will pays totally worng (1182 Views)
|
wrongly1 | 09/12/2020 08:26PM |
 Re: Will pays totally worng (795 Views)
|
rezlegal | 09/12/2020 09:08PM |
  Re: Will pays totally worng (737 Views)
|
Fairmount1 | 09/13/2020 07:58AM |
  Re: Will pays totally worng (707 Views)
|
rezlegal | 09/13/2020 12:48PM |
| Re: Will pays totally worng (771 Views)
|
BitPlayer | 09/12/2020 11:27PM |
| Re: Will pays totally worng (701 Views)
|
wrongly1 | 09/13/2020 09:16AM |
| Re: Will pays totally wrong (667 Views) |
BitPlayer | 09/13/2020 09:45AM |
| Re: Will pays totally wrong (687 Views)
|
wrongly1 | 09/13/2020 10:18AM |
| Re: Will pays totally wrong (699 Views)
|
BitPlayer | 09/13/2020 12:25PM |
| Re: Will pays totally wrong (673 Views)
|
wrongly1 | 09/14/2020 12:18AM |
| Re: Will pays totally wrong (709 Views)
|
P-Dub | 09/15/2020 01:25AM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.