Order Online |
Complete Menu of
TG Data products |
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data |
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse |
Free Products |
Download and Review previous days' data. |
With detailed comments |
Email notification when your horse races |
Information |
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials |
Consulting services and Graph Racing |
Where to buy TG around the country |
Historical
races and handicapping articles |
Handicapping |
Major handicapping contest winners |
|
|
Re: Challenge (1056 Views)
Posted by: HP (IP Logged)
Date: May 24, 2002 04:38PM
Congratulations on using your real name. I can get everything I need from you right here out in the open, so there's no need for any email address or any other personal revelations.
You have taken cheap shots at Jerry on the Sheets board before. In fact, in addition to this carefully reasoned post, you made ANOTHER post simultaneously on the Sheets board that was a little less than carefully reasoned, and it was just removed! Somehow you didn't see fit to mention this part of your campaign. But your Big Brothers are at work again so now no one can see it.
This is not a 'personal attack'. My point stands. I'm not addressing your handicapping points, I'm addressing how you go about doing things.
You didn't JUST post over here, where there can be a response. You posted over there too, where you know there wouldn't be any dialog at all. Why did you write that post over there, Dave? You had already made your points here. Maybe you like to blow your own horn, like you're doing now on the thread to Tiznow, referring everyone over here to see your genius in print.
They don't just delete the 'churlish' posts David, they delete Jerry's too. They leave up the stuff that criticizes and addresses him directly and then they delete his responses. Not a peep out of you. If you don't like the facts, you just leave them out, right Dave? And if it looks like you're screwing up (like your post that they just deleted), they cover your ass. So much for your 'meaningful exchange on handicapping theory'. It may be possible over here, but not on your turf.
Don't tell me you're not aware that they delete Jerry's posts. I have to hand it to Robes, at least his position is consistent. You're something else entirely. You seek to take advantage of a competitor's forum to address differences while endorsing the competitor's deletion of any posts on this subject. At the same, you use your protected forum to fire off attacks on Jerry knowing full well that Jerry can't respond over there. Perfectly okay with you to confine any real debate to THIS forum, while you are free to post your nonsense over there. The more I think about this, the more you disgust me.
The challenge stands. Exotics are fine. $20 a race. If you beat me I may stop handicapping altogether.
As for your comments on War Emblem, he looks to me like he's going to back up on both products, but he might win anyway depending on who else goes. HP
Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1939 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/23/2002 11:48PM |
Challenge (1070 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 12:18PM |
Re: Challenge (1092 Views)
|
nunzio |
05/24/2002 01:33PM |
Re: Challenge (1022 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 01:39PM |
Re: Challenge (1022 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/24/2002 03:53PM |
Re: Challenge (1056 Views) |
HP |
05/24/2002 04:38PM |
Re: Challenge (1036 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/24/2002 06:06PM |
Re: Challenge (1019 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 06:33PM |
Re: Challenge (1130 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/24/2002 10:21PM |
Re: Challenge (1169 Views)
|
Anonymous User |
05/25/2002 01:02PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1205 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/24/2002 05:40PM |
Challenge (1026 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 06:17PM |
HP, another hypocrite (1029 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/24/2002 07:17PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1013 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 07:36PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1033 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/24/2002 07:49PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1044 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/24/2002 10:16PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1099 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/26/2002 01:12PM |
Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1052 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/26/2002 03:36PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1043 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/27/2002 07:22AM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1056 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/27/2002 03:48PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1072 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/27/2002 05:57PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1033 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/27/2002 07:40PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1067 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/29/2002 11:32AM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1074 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/29/2002 09:36AM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1022 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 03:29PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1061 Views)
|
HP |
05/27/2002 05:09PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1107 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/24/2002 09:04PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1110 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/25/2002 09:26AM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1072 Views)
|
HP |
05/25/2002 12:18PM |
More Ragozin Logic (1123 Views)
|
Treadhead |
05/25/2002 12:23PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1156 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/25/2002 05:17PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1087 Views)
|
Mall |
05/28/2002 12:27AM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1121 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/28/2002 03:29PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1088 Views)
|
Jason R. Litt |
05/24/2002 10:54PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1122 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/25/2002 05:20PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (997 Views)
|
Anonymous User |
05/25/2002 12:07PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|