Order Online |
Complete Menu of
TG Data products |
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data |
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse |
Free Products |
Download and Review previous days' data. |
With detailed comments |
Email notification when your horse races |
Information |
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials |
Consulting services and Graph Racing |
Where to buy TG around the country |
Historical
races and handicapping articles |
Handicapping |
Major handicapping contest winners |
|
|
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (996 Views)
Posted by: Anonymous User (IP Logged)
Date: May 25, 2002 12:07PM
One day the mass figure makers will measure the moisture in the track if they do not already. A probe inserted 2, 4, 8 and 12 inches beneath the surface. The density of the surface materials will also need to be factored. Until that time it will be a matter of speculation and debate. But anyone knows that a very low humidity day with strong wind can alter a track's condition almost hourly. I garden and I have seen the surface and soil change quickly under those conditions. You've got to be very careful with subjectively altering figures however. At the same time, a track surface is more a living, evolving thing than a static mass of materials. I'm still in favor of the handicapping challenge. Let the best of theirs go up against the best here and see how the results shake out. Do it on a regular basis and I think it will become self evident who makes the better variants. A speed figure really is nothing more than the variant determined with some precision.
Tabitha
Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1938 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/23/2002 11:48PM |
Challenge (1070 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 12:18PM |
Re: Challenge (1092 Views)
|
nunzio |
05/24/2002 01:33PM |
Re: Challenge (1022 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 01:39PM |
Re: Challenge (1022 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/24/2002 03:53PM |
Re: Challenge (1056 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 04:38PM |
Re: Challenge (1035 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/24/2002 06:06PM |
Re: Challenge (1019 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 06:33PM |
Re: Challenge (1130 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/24/2002 10:21PM |
Re: Challenge (1169 Views)
|
Anonymous User |
05/25/2002 01:02PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1204 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/24/2002 05:40PM |
Challenge (1025 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 06:17PM |
HP, another hypocrite (1029 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/24/2002 07:17PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1012 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 07:36PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1032 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/24/2002 07:49PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1043 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/24/2002 10:16PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1099 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/26/2002 01:12PM |
Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1051 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/26/2002 03:36PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1042 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/27/2002 07:22AM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1055 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/27/2002 03:48PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1070 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/27/2002 05:57PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1033 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/27/2002 07:40PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1063 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/29/2002 11:32AM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1073 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/29/2002 09:36AM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1022 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 03:29PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1061 Views)
|
HP |
05/27/2002 05:09PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1106 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/24/2002 09:04PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1110 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/25/2002 09:26AM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1071 Views)
|
HP |
05/25/2002 12:18PM |
More Ragozin Logic (1122 Views)
|
Treadhead |
05/25/2002 12:23PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1154 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/25/2002 05:17PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1085 Views)
|
Mall |
05/28/2002 12:27AM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1121 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/28/2002 03:29PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1087 Views)
|
Jason R. Litt |
05/24/2002 10:54PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1122 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/25/2002 05:20PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (996 Views) |
Anonymous User |
05/25/2002 12:07PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|