Order Online |
Complete Menu of
TG Data products |
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data |
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse |
Free Products |
Download and Review previous days' data. |
With detailed comments |
Email notification when your horse races |
Information |
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials |
Consulting services and Graph Racing |
Where to buy TG around the country |
Historical
races and handicapping articles |
Handicapping |
Major handicapping contest winners |
|
|
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (997 Views)
Posted by: Anonymous User (IP Logged)
Date: May 25, 2002 12:07PM
One day the mass figure makers will measure the moisture in the track if they do not already. A probe inserted 2, 4, 8 and 12 inches beneath the surface. The density of the surface materials will also need to be factored. Until that time it will be a matter of speculation and debate. But anyone knows that a very low humidity day with strong wind can alter a track's condition almost hourly. I garden and I have seen the surface and soil change quickly under those conditions. You've got to be very careful with subjectively altering figures however. At the same time, a track surface is more a living, evolving thing than a static mass of materials. I'm still in favor of the handicapping challenge. Let the best of theirs go up against the best here and see how the results shake out. Do it on a regular basis and I think it will become self evident who makes the better variants. A speed figure really is nothing more than the variant determined with some precision.
Tabitha
Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1940 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/23/2002 11:48PM |
Challenge (1072 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 12:18PM |
Re: Challenge (1094 Views)
|
nunzio |
05/24/2002 01:33PM |
Re: Challenge (1024 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 01:39PM |
Re: Challenge (1024 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/24/2002 03:53PM |
Re: Challenge (1058 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 04:38PM |
Re: Challenge (1038 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/24/2002 06:06PM |
Re: Challenge (1022 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 06:33PM |
Re: Challenge (1134 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/24/2002 10:21PM |
Re: Challenge (1171 Views)
|
Anonymous User |
05/25/2002 01:02PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1206 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/24/2002 05:40PM |
Challenge (1026 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 06:17PM |
HP, another hypocrite (1030 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/24/2002 07:17PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1015 Views)
|
HP |
05/24/2002 07:36PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1035 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/24/2002 07:49PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1047 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/24/2002 10:16PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1101 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/26/2002 01:12PM |
Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1055 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/26/2002 03:36PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1044 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/27/2002 07:22AM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1057 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/27/2002 03:48PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1075 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/27/2002 05:57PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1037 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/27/2002 07:40PM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1071 Views)
|
Jerry Jr. |
05/29/2002 11:32AM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1075 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/29/2002 09:36AM |
Re: Rosencrantz? Guildenstern? (1026 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 03:29PM |
Re: HP, another hypocrite (1063 Views)
|
HP |
05/27/2002 05:09PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1110 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/24/2002 09:04PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1113 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/25/2002 09:26AM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1074 Views)
|
HP |
05/25/2002 12:18PM |
More Ragozin Logic (1124 Views)
|
Treadhead |
05/25/2002 12:23PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1158 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/25/2002 05:17PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1087 Views)
|
Mall |
05/28/2002 12:27AM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1123 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/28/2002 03:29PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1090 Views)
|
Jason R. Litt |
05/24/2002 10:54PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (1125 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/25/2002 05:20PM |
Re: Jerry, Jerry, Jerry (997 Views) |
Anonymous User |
05/25/2002 12:07PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|