Re: Razzle and the other board (6511 Views)
Posted by:
razzle (IP Logged)
Date: September 06, 2005 12:47PM
Jimbo66,
Below are some excerpts from your post which I would categorize as personal insults,
"ignorant posts"
"Can you read?"
"Got dumb responses from Len,..."
*****************************
The following excerpt from you is just mistaken,
"Razzle, you and Friedman both refer to me as an anonymous poster."
Jimbo, I don't regard you as anonymous. I appreciated that you identified yourself. I took issue with you saying, repeatedly, that you are unable to figure out how to get your own password over there. Especially since you "supervise 100 programmers" and are facile with "probalities, algorithms and the interface with batch betting."
*******************************
"Razzle, your posts here are so typical of the other board, you should have put them there. Distort the facts, twist the story to the point where it seems up is down and down is up, and then fight any attempt by anybody to report the facts correctly."
The facts, Jimbo, that I referred to when I mentioned your name:
"I liked your posts..."
"you got what you deserved in response from Len F"
You asked for a comparison of the products. You were given the results of a prior study. It didn't meet your needs.
You attacked LF's marketing response.
You apparently became offended that LF took your posts to reveal an underlying ulterior motive.
*****************************************
"Funny how when I click 'razzle', no information is available. Who is the anonymous one?"
Jimbo, JB has my e-mailaddress, as is required for this board. The following is what I received from him at that address last week(my home).
">
>
>So, it took me a while to find your e-mail address, "Raz".
>
>You were the guy who wanted me to tone it down, right? Not be confrontational?
>
>And yet you were also one of the ones who made the unprovoked
>personal attacks on me on the Rag board recently, right?
>
>Same guy? Right?
>
>Aside from completely misrepresenting everything about the situation
>(it is a suit about a business dispute), you helped raise the
>temperature quite a bit between the two boards. Wouldn't you say?
>Especially since I had mentioned those guys almost never recently,
>and then only in connection with figure making issues-- not personal attacks.
>
>But I expected no less. You are a f---ing hypocrite-- but you knew
>that. Just wanted you to know that I knew it too.
>
>JB"
So, Jimbo, as you can see, there are some justifications for people attempting to protect themselves. ( Of course, he had no way of knowing whether children would have access to that e-mail) Isn't that awful? That was the entire post. I hadn't contacted him. I haven't even mentioned it until now, nor have I responded to it.
*************************************
Jimbo,
I apologize to you for dragging you into this by naming you in my original post, and commenting on your exchange with LF. It really wasn't my place. I have no bone to pick with you, other than my confusion about your inability to get a password over there? My e-mail address is carissell@yahoo.com.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/06/2005 01:03PM by TGJB.