Order Online |
Complete Menu of
TG Data products |
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data |
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse |
Free Products |
Download and Review previous days' data. |
With detailed comments |
Email notification when your horse races |
Information |
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials |
Consulting services and Graph Racing |
Where to buy TG around the country |
Historical
races and handicapping articles |
Handicapping |
Major handicapping contest winners |
|
|
Re: Okay, Listen (544 Views)
Posted by: sighthound (IP Logged)
Date: August 13, 2007 12:48AM
" 6-- At the minimum, to give the BETTOR a fighting chance, we need to have all CO2 tests published (every horse, every race), and a vet of record listed in the program. At that point we can look at some stats and run some sheets and see how things correlate, and begin to have a real discussion."
Race horses have been doped since the first wager passed between neighbors. Drugs like heroin, cocaine used to be obtainable legally by anyone. Horses were routinely given stimulants to race, trainers would withdraw the drug on purpose so the horse would have poor race, then score a betting coup next race out on drugs. It was open and common. Including some names who have won the Triple Crown. Bettors used to get mad if they lost money, and later learned the horse wasn't doped, "as usual".
There has never been an accepted national standard of uniformity for drugs forbidden, allowable, withdrawal times, allowable levels (levels at which performance is unaffected, and these do exist).
That would be the first best step towards eliminating drug abuse. Good luck with that, but I hope that day will soon come.
I agree with TGJB that having all CO2 results published would help eliminate excess milkshaking to some extent (trainers would simply become more sophisticated on amounts they could use).
I disagree on publishing a "vet of record". While the intent is to associate a particular name with particular results, one trainer could certainly needlessly destroy a professional's reputation. Certainly the honest vet could dump that client, but it would be quite too late.
Okay, Listen (1190 Views)
|
TGJB |
08/12/2007 04:14PM |
Re: Okay, Listen (657 Views)
|
ditz |
08/12/2007 04:31PM |
Re: Okay, Listen (583 Views)
|
alm |
08/12/2007 09:15PM |
Re: Okay, Listen (563 Views)
|
rosewood |
08/12/2007 11:08PM |
Re: Okay, Listen (591 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
08/13/2007 12:07AM |
Re: Okay, Listen (540 Views)
|
spa |
08/13/2007 12:20AM |
Re: Okay, Listen (575 Views)
|
NoCarolinaTony |
08/13/2007 12:37AM |
Re: Okay, Listen (602 Views)
|
sighthound |
08/13/2007 01:14AM |
Re: Okay, Listen (522 Views)
|
JR |
08/13/2007 01:35PM |
Re: Okay, Listen (563 Views)
|
girly |
08/13/2007 09:20AM |
Re: Okay, Listen (550 Views)
|
richiebee |
08/13/2007 05:50PM |
Re: Okay, Listen (501 Views)
|
girly |
08/14/2007 07:24PM |
Re: Okay, Listen (654 Views)
|
TGJB |
08/13/2007 06:58PM |
Re: Okay, Listen (542 Views)
|
fkach |
08/13/2007 08:36AM |
Re: Okay, Listen (544 Views) |
sighthound |
08/13/2007 12:48AM |
Re: Okay, Listen (495 Views)
|
fkach |
08/13/2007 09:03AM |
Re: Okay, Listen (547 Views)
|
miff |
08/13/2007 10:13AM |
Re: Okay, Listen (567 Views)
|
marcus |
08/13/2007 12:57PM |
Re: Okay, Listen (616 Views)
|
Barry Irwin |
08/13/2007 11:07PM |
Re: Okay, Listen (536 Views)
|
alm |
08/14/2007 05:24PM |
Re: Okay, Listen (470 Views)
|
JimP |
08/15/2007 09:47AM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|