Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Okay, Listen (544 Views)
Posted by: sighthound (IP Logged)
Date: August 13, 2007 12:48AM

" 6-- At the minimum, to give the BETTOR a fighting chance, we need to have all CO2 tests published (every horse, every race), and a vet of record listed in the program. At that point we can look at some stats and run some sheets and see how things correlate, and begin to have a real discussion."

Race horses have been doped since the first wager passed between neighbors. Drugs like heroin, cocaine used to be obtainable legally by anyone. Horses were routinely given stimulants to race, trainers would withdraw the drug on purpose so the horse would have poor race, then score a betting coup next race out on drugs. It was open and common. Including some names who have won the Triple Crown. Bettors used to get mad if they lost money, and later learned the horse wasn't doped, "as usual".

There has never been an accepted national standard of uniformity for drugs forbidden, allowable, withdrawal times, allowable levels (levels at which performance is unaffected, and these do exist).

That would be the first best step towards eliminating drug abuse. Good luck with that, but I hope that day will soon come.

I agree with TGJB that having all CO2 results published would help eliminate excess milkshaking to some extent (trainers would simply become more sophisticated on amounts they could use).

I disagree on publishing a "vet of record". While the intent is to associate a particular name with particular results, one trainer could certainly needlessly destroy a professional's reputation. Certainly the honest vet could dump that client, but it would be quite too late.



Subject Written By Posted
Okay, Listen (1190 Views) TGJB 08/12/2007 04:14PM
Re: Okay, Listen (657 Views) ditz 08/12/2007 04:31PM
Re: Okay, Listen (583 Views) alm 08/12/2007 09:15PM
Re: Okay, Listen (563 Views) rosewood 08/12/2007 11:08PM
Re: Okay, Listen (591 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 08/13/2007 12:07AM
Re: Okay, Listen (540 Views) spa 08/13/2007 12:20AM
Re: Okay, Listen (575 Views) NoCarolinaTony 08/13/2007 12:37AM
Re: Okay, Listen (602 Views) sighthound 08/13/2007 01:14AM
Re: Okay, Listen (522 Views) JR 08/13/2007 01:35PM
Re: Okay, Listen (563 Views) girly 08/13/2007 09:20AM
Re: Okay, Listen (550 Views) richiebee 08/13/2007 05:50PM
Re: Okay, Listen (501 Views) girly 08/14/2007 07:24PM
Re: Okay, Listen (654 Views) TGJB 08/13/2007 06:58PM
Re: Okay, Listen (542 Views) fkach 08/13/2007 08:36AM
Re: Okay, Listen (544 Views) sighthound 08/13/2007 12:48AM
Re: Okay, Listen (495 Views) fkach 08/13/2007 09:03AM
Re: Okay, Listen (547 Views) miff 08/13/2007 10:13AM
Re: Okay, Listen (567 Views) marcus 08/13/2007 12:57PM
Re: Okay, Listen (616 Views) Barry Irwin 08/13/2007 11:07PM
Re: Okay, Listen (536 Views) alm 08/14/2007 05:24PM
Re: Okay, Listen (470 Views) JimP 08/15/2007 09:47AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.