Re: Kryptonite (433 Views)
Posted by:
sighthound (IP Logged)
Date: September 02, 2007 04:42PM
Because this is my nature, I
> will assume for the sense of
> argument that each statement, especially the
> negative ones, are directed at me
> personally.
Naw. I did comment directly to your post as it concerns the insurance statement. I took issue with the [i]statement[/i], certainly not the person making it (insert friendly, hand-shaking emoticon here).
The rest of my post I intended to be pissed-off but generalized editorializing about the nature of recent discussions at large.
Drug abuse - this topic certainly needs to be discussed, it won't go away. And it shouldn't.
But I think the majority of people on this board are more intelligent than average (or they would not gravitate to TG products), and I would hope we can embrace less, "Hahaha, white Mercedes musta been there", in favor of a more serious, factual and educational dialogue.
The wagering community doesn't currently garner much respect from horsemen, yet it needs to invited to the table on this topic, as it has much to offer.
I'm out on this for now, gentlemen.