Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Always negative (790 Views)
Posted by: P-Dub (IP Logged)
Date: May 07, 2009 03:40PM

jimbo66 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Agreed. 100%.
>
> They were great sportsmen. The fact that they had
> the best dirt horse in the world, sent that horse
> to Dubai to run, brought him back and tried him on
> turf with the goal of running him in the Arc if he
> proved good enough, and then when he didn't, they
> ran him on the carpet at Santa Anita, proved to
> this gambler that they are sportsmen.
>

I don't know about being a great "sportsman".

The guy is 78 years old and is one of the wealthiest men in our country. So he has 2 choices:

-retire his star horse and watch him mount some mares in a barn and earn more money that he won't even begin to count.
- Be the center of attention at many major races around the world, watching his star race horses compete.

He's doing it for the thrill of competition, not because of anything resembling being a sportsman. What else is he going to do with Curlin?? Why do you think he bought RA?? So he can send her to the shed?? Can't wait to breed her to Curlin. Sure. I'm sure thats the plan eventually, but its a distant second to the main reason.

Now, if he were 20-30 years younger, it would be much more "sporting" to continue to race instead of retiring these horses.

Take Rachel Alexandra. Price was no object, he was buying this horse. Period. Why?? Because at 78 years old, he knows you can't take your money with you to the grave. So he spends millions on RA so he can again be the center of attention of the racing world. Drop her right into the Preakness. How sporting of him.

Look, if I had all that loot I would do the same thing. More power to him and good for him. He's earned his money and he can do whatever he pleases with it. Buy some horses, have some fun. I get it.

Just don't call him a great sportsman.

P-Dub



Subject Written By Posted
Always negative (1662 Views) jimbo66 05/07/2009 11:03AM
Re: Always negative (1040 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 11:52AM
Re: Always negative (1067 Views) miff 05/07/2009 12:34PM
Re: Always negative (907 Views) Electrocutioner 05/07/2009 12:49PM
Re: Always negative (758 Views) Funny Cide 05/08/2009 04:34PM
Re: Always negative (900 Views) Thehoarsehorseplayer 05/07/2009 12:54PM
Re: Always negative (781 Views) Niall 05/07/2009 01:16PM
Re: Always negative (813 Views) miff 05/07/2009 01:24PM
Re: Always negative (847 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 01:44PM
Re: Always negative (887 Views) miff 05/07/2009 02:04PM
Re: Always negative (756 Views) Uncle Buck 05/07/2009 02:12PM
Re: Always negative (823 Views) miff 05/07/2009 02:17PM
Re: Always negative (772 Views) jimbo66 05/07/2009 02:20PM
Re: Always negative (790 Views) P-Dub 05/07/2009 03:40PM
Re: Always negative (815 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 03:24PM
Re: Always negative (877 Views) miff 05/07/2009 03:45PM
Re: Always negative (816 Views) magicnight 05/07/2009 03:51PM
Re: Always negative (742 Views) miff 05/07/2009 05:56PM
Re: Always negative (799 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 04:02PM
Re: Always negative (749 Views) miff 05/07/2009 04:12PM
Re: Always negative (743 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 04:21PM
Re: Always negative (840 Views) mjellish 05/07/2009 04:52PM
Re: Always negative (794 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 04:58PM
Re: Always negative (805 Views) Cartman 05/08/2009 11:07AM
Re: Always negative (678 Views) HP 05/08/2009 03:06PM
Re: Always negative (739 Views) jimbo66 05/07/2009 04:20PM
Re: Always negative (795 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 04:22PM
Re: Always negative (946 Views) TGJB 05/08/2009 03:47PM
Re: Always negative (730 Views) ronwar 05/07/2009 09:30PM
Re: Always negative (775 Views) rosewood 05/07/2009 09:38PM
Re: Always negative (788 Views) TGJB 05/08/2009 03:42PM
Re: Always negative (808 Views) miff 05/08/2009 04:04PM
Re: Always negative (850 Views) TGJB 05/08/2009 04:12PM
Re: Always negative (785 Views) miff 05/08/2009 04:32PM
Re: Always negative (915 Views) jimbo66 05/07/2009 02:14PM
Re: Always negative (774 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 03:15PM
Re: Always negative (841 Views) Lost Cause 05/07/2009 11:48PM
Re: Always negative (725 Views) covelj70 05/08/2009 09:00AM
Re: Always negative (842 Views) TGJB 05/08/2009 03:57PM
Re: Always negative (768 Views) Funny Cide 05/08/2009 04:56PM
Re: Always negative (923 Views) TGAB 05/07/2009 06:30PM
Re: Always negative (772 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 07:39PM
Re: Always negative (838 Views) smalltimer 05/07/2009 07:51PM
Re: Always negative (736 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 07:53PM
Re: Always negative (759 Views) smalltimer 05/07/2009 08:21PM
Re: Always negative (876 Views) TGAB 05/07/2009 07:53PM
Re: Always negative (733 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 01:35PM
Re: Always negative (815 Views) jma11473 05/07/2009 01:56PM
Re: Always negative (815 Views) Thehoarsehorseplayer 05/07/2009 02:26PM
Re: Always negative (796 Views) Funny Cide 05/08/2009 04:38PM
Re: Always negative (891 Views) mjellish 05/08/2009 05:10PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.