Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Always negative (742 Views)
Posted by: miff (IP Logged)
Date: May 07, 2009 05:56PM

Rachel now with Asmussen; Preakness an option
By Marty McGee
LOUISVILLE, Ky. - Rachel Alexandra was transferred early Thursday into the Churchill Downs stable of trainer Steve Asmussen, who said the May 16 Preakness Stakes is an option for the standout filly.

Rachel Alexandra, a record-setting winner of the May 1 Kentucky Oaks at Churchill, was led by Asmussen and his assistant, Scott Blasi, from the Churchill barn of her previous trainer, Hal Wiggins, at about 5:15 a.m. Thursday. Jess Jackson, who purchased the filly the previous day for an undisclosed price in the name of his Stonestreet Stables and in partnership with Harold T. McCormick, a longtime friend, was on hand at Churchill for the exchange.

About an hour after being led into the Asmussen shed row, Rachel Alexandra was sent out for routine training. Asmussen called her "a tremendous physical specimen. We're honored to be around her. She looked great going over the racetrack this morning. The way she looks and the way she trains is a credit to Mr. Wiggins and his staff."

Asked later if it was the Jackson's intentions to race her against males in the Preakness at Pimlico, Asmussen said: "Her ability allows for a tremendous number of options."

Asmussen said he intends to put Rachel Alexandra through an easy workout "Sunday or Monday, depending on the weather and the condition of the surface," and that there was no specific timetable regarding a decision on whether she will run in the Preakness.

Entries for the Preakness, the second jewel of the Triple Crown, will be taken Wednesday. Rachel Alexandra is not nominated to the Triple Crown and therefore would have to be supplemented for a $100,000 fee. Supplemental entries in any Triple Crown race have lowest preference for making the field, so in the case that more than 14 horses are entered in the Preakness, she would be excluded.

Pimlico officials said they had been contacted Tuesday by a Stonestreet representative about procedures involving supplemental entries but that the name of a specific horse had not been mentioned.

If Rachel Alexandra were to run in the Preakness, it is unclear how that would affect Calvin Borel, who became just the seventh jockey in history to win the Kentucky Oaks and Kentucky Derby on the same weekend. A little more than 24 hours after winning aboard Rachel Alexandra in the Oaks, Borel rode Mine That Bird to a 50-1 upset in the Derby. Borel's agent, Jerry Hissam, declined to comment when asked about a hypothetical conflict, although he might not even have to make such a difficult decision, since Jackson and Asmussen rarely employ Borel on their horses.

Robby Albarado was the regular rider for Jackson and Asmussen on Curlin, their 2007-08 Horse of the Year. Asked if acquiring Albarado's services for the Preakness was in the works, Asmussen said: "That decision has not been made."



Subject Written By Posted
Always negative (1662 Views) jimbo66 05/07/2009 11:03AM
Re: Always negative (1040 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 11:52AM
Re: Always negative (1067 Views) miff 05/07/2009 12:34PM
Re: Always negative (907 Views) Electrocutioner 05/07/2009 12:49PM
Re: Always negative (758 Views) Funny Cide 05/08/2009 04:34PM
Re: Always negative (900 Views) Thehoarsehorseplayer 05/07/2009 12:54PM
Re: Always negative (781 Views) Niall 05/07/2009 01:16PM
Re: Always negative (813 Views) miff 05/07/2009 01:24PM
Re: Always negative (847 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 01:44PM
Re: Always negative (887 Views) miff 05/07/2009 02:04PM
Re: Always negative (756 Views) Uncle Buck 05/07/2009 02:12PM
Re: Always negative (823 Views) miff 05/07/2009 02:17PM
Re: Always negative (772 Views) jimbo66 05/07/2009 02:20PM
Re: Always negative (791 Views) P-Dub 05/07/2009 03:40PM
Re: Always negative (815 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 03:24PM
Re: Always negative (877 Views) miff 05/07/2009 03:45PM
Re: Always negative (816 Views) magicnight 05/07/2009 03:51PM
Re: Always negative (742 Views) miff 05/07/2009 05:56PM
Re: Always negative (799 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 04:02PM
Re: Always negative (749 Views) miff 05/07/2009 04:12PM
Re: Always negative (743 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 04:21PM
Re: Always negative (840 Views) mjellish 05/07/2009 04:52PM
Re: Always negative (794 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 04:58PM
Re: Always negative (805 Views) Cartman 05/08/2009 11:07AM
Re: Always negative (678 Views) HP 05/08/2009 03:06PM
Re: Always negative (739 Views) jimbo66 05/07/2009 04:20PM
Re: Always negative (795 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 04:22PM
Re: Always negative (946 Views) TGJB 05/08/2009 03:47PM
Re: Always negative (730 Views) ronwar 05/07/2009 09:30PM
Re: Always negative (775 Views) rosewood 05/07/2009 09:38PM
Re: Always negative (789 Views) TGJB 05/08/2009 03:42PM
Re: Always negative (808 Views) miff 05/08/2009 04:04PM
Re: Always negative (850 Views) TGJB 05/08/2009 04:12PM
Re: Always negative (785 Views) miff 05/08/2009 04:32PM
Re: Always negative (915 Views) jimbo66 05/07/2009 02:14PM
Re: Always negative (774 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 03:15PM
Re: Always negative (841 Views) Lost Cause 05/07/2009 11:48PM
Re: Always negative (725 Views) covelj70 05/08/2009 09:00AM
Re: Always negative (842 Views) TGJB 05/08/2009 03:57PM
Re: Always negative (768 Views) Funny Cide 05/08/2009 04:56PM
Re: Always negative (923 Views) TGAB 05/07/2009 06:30PM
Re: Always negative (772 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 07:39PM
Re: Always negative (838 Views) smalltimer 05/07/2009 07:51PM
Re: Always negative (737 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 07:53PM
Re: Always negative (759 Views) smalltimer 05/07/2009 08:21PM
Re: Always negative (876 Views) TGAB 05/07/2009 07:53PM
Re: Always negative (733 Views) covelj70 05/07/2009 01:35PM
Re: Always negative (815 Views) jma11473 05/07/2009 01:56PM
Re: Always negative (815 Views) Thehoarsehorseplayer 05/07/2009 02:26PM
Re: Always negative (796 Views) Funny Cide 05/08/2009 04:38PM
Re: Always negative (891 Views) mjellish 05/08/2009 05:10PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.