Re: ROTW (444 Views)
Posted by:
Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: July 18, 2005 07:49AM
Michael D. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ctc,
> you stated in other posts that you were big time
> negative on SK. in fact, you could probably find
> over a thousand words of ctc analysis that was
> wrong before you found one decent winner. why?
> that's the only question i have. we are all wrong
> most of the time, but why make such a fool out of
> yourself?
>
> "
Michael, I said that I wasn't fond of Sun King cutting back especially in consideration of his Classic penchant for giving ground. Additionally, that was a track High Limit had been very comfortable with in the past and he is the better horse at that distance on his best day. I saw the post position and blinkers though and still wouldn't bet that race knowing Sun King was reverting to his earlier running style. If you think you scored a biggy more power to you. There is foolishness in this thread and its not related to my questioning Sun King or Passing. I've questioned Sun King all along and been successful in doing so and I passed 90% of the races I handicapped over the weekend. In the Leonard Richards I both questioned Sun King and passed. He'll be beaten next time because his main competition won't be off form and he's not a horse a prudent handicapper is gonna bet.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.