Re: ROTW (526 Views)
Posted by:
Millennium3 (IP Logged)
Date: July 18, 2005 11:03AM
NC Tony wrote: "The fig that day has been over scutinized. It was in line with the rest of the day as best as I can remember. If any race needs to be re assessed it may be the Blue Grass."
This is a great example of what I mean. In line with what - figures pored over from sheets prior to LA Derby Day, right? That's what I mean when I say they're subjective.
And if you make the claim that the Blue Grass needs to be re-evaluated, remember this: according to TG the Blue Grass figs were based on High Limit repeating his LA Derby Figure. So if the Blue Grass needs to be re-evaluated, you make my point conclusively: the LA Derby figure is phony.
And I'm still waiting for you to show me where I used the words "stupid" or "ignorant" to describe anybody. All the posts I made have one common thread: TG screwed up in assessing High Limit as a horse that is a legitimate "1" type horse. He's not. They were wrong. And his efforts that followed the LA Derby prove it. They made an error in this case that's clear. I never said that TG doesn't know what it's doing. We all make mistakes.
TG is to be commended, in fact profusely thanked for one reason above all others: they led the charge of identifying and dealing with the "move up" trainers and owners. For that alone they deserve the respect from anyone that bets on horses.
M3
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.