Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Paying Attention (561 Views)
Posted by: richiebee (IP Logged)
Date: August 11, 2007 03:31PM

CtC:

I have as much patience for your posts as anyone, but on this particular topic
it is time for you to "put up or shut up".

You say "ASSUME for the sake of argument that (Pletcher) did take on Steve
Allday (in 2000)..." Why should we ASSUME this? Because it makes your theory
more viable? The information is out there. As the architect of the "Pletcher
was just another trainer until he hooked up with Allday" theory, you owe it to
yourself and the rest of us to determine EXACTLY WHEN ALLDAY BEGAN TREATING
PLETCHER'S HORSES.

You establish 2000 as a line of demarcation in Pletcher's emergence as a top
trainer. Can we ASSUME that TAP had much better racing stock to work with after
2000 than before 2000? The people who are buying the high priced bloodstock you
mention could give these runners to any trainer-- from known doper Patrick
Biancone to the hay oats and water guys like Mott or Nafzger (or even the very
blonde but very inept Jamie Sanders). Is there any better proof of the
superiority of the bloodstock which TAP has access to than the fact that he was
able to win the 2007 Belmont with a filly who was a half sibling to the 2006
Belmont Stakes winner, and was sired by the 1992 Belmont Stakes winner?

In relation to the death of Left Bank, we do not have to ASSUME here. Simply
using any popular search engine you can see that Left Bank fell victim to colic;
if you go past the first or second articles, you will see that Left Bank was a
colic prone animal(he had a serious bout of colic as a 2YO which resulted in
the removal of a portion of his intestine).

Your post dissolves into sheer hysteria at the end, where you say "Write NYRA
and the boards of the racing states, inform them of the facts and demand
greater scrutiny of cheaters in general and Pletcher in particular"

As Alex Rodriquez once famously said while rounding the bases in a game against
the Blue Jays, HA!. What is NYRA going to do against Pletcher (one marginal
positive in 11 years while saddling a high volume of runners) when they allow
known cheater Patrick Biancone (excluded from participation in racing on two
continents, currently under investigation in Kentucky) to continue to ply his
trade?

The truth is out there CTC. The inclusion of the truth in your posts,especially
when it replaces mere conjecture, would strengthen your arguments.



Subject Written By Posted
Paying Attention (1169 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 08/10/2007 10:26PM
Re: Paying Attention (505 Views) congaree1 08/10/2007 10:52PM
Re: Paying Attention (535 Views) NoCarolinaTony 08/11/2007 01:20AM
Re: Paying Attention (569 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 08/11/2007 09:05AM
Re: Paying Attention (463 Views) NoCarolinaTony 08/11/2007 09:52AM
Re: Paying Attention (523 Views) Barry Irwin 08/11/2007 12:11PM
Re: Paying Attention (531 Views) Barry Irwin 08/11/2007 11:28PM
Re: Paying Attention (507 Views) imallin 08/11/2007 09:55AM
Re: Paying Attention (528 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 08/11/2007 10:53AM
Re: Paying Attention (458 Views) ditz 08/11/2007 11:05AM
Re: Paying Attention (561 Views) richiebee 08/11/2007 03:31PM
Re: Paying Attention (509 Views) miff 08/11/2007 06:32PM
Re: Paying Attention (506 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 08/11/2007 09:06PM
Re: Paying Attention (479 Views) Michael D. 08/11/2007 09:25PM
Re: Paying Attention (476 Views) marcus 08/11/2007 11:29PM
Re: Paying Attention (455 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 08/12/2007 11:23AM
Re: Paying Attention (481 Views) sighthound 08/12/2007 11:45AM
Re: Paying Attention - there maybe something to this (452 Views) ronwar 08/12/2007 01:02PM
What happened to handicapping Dude (575 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 08/12/2007 02:36PM
Re: What happened to handicapping Dude (491 Views) alm 08/12/2007 09:21PM
Re: Paying Attention (483 Views) richiebee 08/11/2007 10:50PM
The Burden of Proof (563 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 08/12/2007 09:24AM
Re: Paying Attention (484 Views) MO 08/11/2007 10:34PM
Gamblers and Handicappers, Top of the Ninth (567 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 08/11/2007 11:30PM
Re: Gamblers and Handicappers, Top of the Ninth (625 Views) Barry Irwin 08/11/2007 11:33PM
Re: Gamblers and Handicappers, Top of the Ninth (500 Views) miff 08/12/2007 09:26AM
Re: Gamblers and Handicappers, Top of the Ninth (517 Views) MO 08/11/2007 11:59PM
Re: Gamblers and Handicappers, Top of the Ninth (468 Views) fkach 08/12/2007 09:35AM
Re: Gamblers and Handicappers, Top of the Ninth (457 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 08/12/2007 12:37PM
Re: Gamblers and Handicappers, Top of the Ninth (484 Views) fkach 08/12/2007 02:29PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.