Re: Gamblers and Handicappers, Top of the Ninth (457 Views)
Posted by:
Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: August 12, 2007 12:37PM
You're behind the curveball again fkach, the burden of proof has now legally shifted to you. Call it res ipsa loquitur if you wish.
Its now up to you and the other naysayers to offer proof that Plech and/or his stable did not do something to kill his horses in August of 2002. I don't think you understand that yet.
See you at the windows.
fkach Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Chuckles,
>
> The problem is that you present your OPINIONS and
> weak evidence against Pletcher as if they offer
> irrefutable proof that the rest of us are too dumb
> to understand. You also seem to obsess over him.
> IMO, most people would probably argue that there
> are many better targets for attack among the
> leading trainers.
>
> We are allowed to have suspicions and sometimes we
> even know someone is guilty without being able to
> prove it. However, there are some very logical
> legal explanations for TP's training success and
> for the performances of many of the horses you
> have complained about. IMHO, that much is so
> clear, it gets hard to swallow your attitude on
> this.
>
> I think if you presented your evidence as reasons
> for suspicion and listened carefully to the
> counter arguments, we wouldn't have to debate this
> endlessly and no one would have a problem with
> your view.