Gamblers and Handicappers, Top of the Ninth (567 Views)
Posted by:
Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: August 11, 2007 11:30PM
MO, when it comes to observations, there is no one better at them than a handicapper. The problem is gamblers are not very good at observations and there's the rub.
Its not my delivery that is the problem. I'm throwing it over the plate, but there's too much velocity and movement for many of the batters in this park to even see the pill. let alone make contact.
I'm sure Plech is a nice guy. I'm sure he wouldn't intentionally club a baby seal or win knowing his horse had to die. I honestly believe that losing the horses bothers him. In his comments from the die off, you can read between the lines and understand he was struggling with experimenting on them. I'm also certain he ingratiates himself easily. But, you're not saying a nice guy can't be as money motivated and self interested as the next check kiter, bank robber or axe murderer are you?
MO, a fair percentage of the posters here are pari mutual fodder. They don't have any significance other than adding to the pools. Among them you'll find trainer bettors and those type cash often enough on Plech that they consider challenging him blasphemy. Then there's the group of guys that include you. Folks without ego that are civil to all. I'm not in your league there, but if you note I only let those have it that are rude and have the truth coming to them on ignorance.
But MO its within Your power. If you shake hands with Plech now and then ask him. Break into it with psychology. Tell him you just read an interesting article on Allday and that you understand he works for Plech, then slide into asking when Allday first began treating horses for him.
You'll find its right at the time I've indicated.
I'll drop the topic for the time being. Those that can contribute now understand how. We'll pick it up again when there's another 'development".
MO Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> At the risk of having a new asshole reamed by many
> of the posters here because in their eyes I'm just
> a "lucky asshole bugler", I'm going out on a limb
> here to offer my observations ( I do get paid to
> observe, so I'm confident that I know my
> observations are accurate) and hope you will be
> patient enough to indulge me here:
>
> Chuck: I used to have a real problem with anger
> and depression. I got help and got "cured",
> although many people choose to put me "in a box"
> and refuse to believe it. That's a long story and
> I won't go into the details, but there was one
> time before I got help that my younger brother
> said to me after I was complaining about a family
> matter: "You know, we know everything you say is
> right, but your delivery sucks! And therefore we
> ignore you."
>
> I know Todd well enough to say hello. He knows who
> I am and we used to watch races together when he
> worked for Lukas. He's not a friend, just an
> acquaintance. But we have a mutual respect for each
> other. He has no problem walking up to me (unlike
> his boss) and shaking my hand.
>
> I personally do not believe he's a cheater, just a
> great student and has learned from mistakes of his
> teachers. But I do believe that there is so much
> cheating going on that I choose not to put my $
> through the windows any more as a professional
> handicapper (with lifetime profit in the tens of
> thousands of dollars still intact).
>
> I do think some of the personal attacks against
> Chuck are warrented because of his delivery, but I
> also look at those same people attacking Chuck and
> their posts and can't help but think they are
> sadly brainwashed into believing that Chuck's
> accusations are impossible.